Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

GLM-4.6 Instruct vs MiniMax-M2: which model should you choose?

We compared GLM-4.6 Instruct and MiniMax-M2 on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. MiniMax-M2 has the stronger average benchmark score; MiniMax-M2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Zhipu AI

GLM-4.6 Instruct

GLM-4.6 Instruct is a multimodal model from Zhipu AI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $5.15 per million input tokens and $24.32 per million output tokens, and averages 80.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.15 / 1M
Output
$24.32 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
80.4
Open weights
Yes
Full GLM-4.6 Instruct page
MiniMax

MiniMax-M2

MiniMax-M2 is a multimodal model from MiniMax. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $5.19 per million input tokens and $22.73 per million output tokens, and averages 80.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.19 / 1M
Output
$22.73 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
80.6
Open weights
Yes
Full MiniMax-M2 page

Specification comparison

SpecGLM-4.6 InstructMiniMax-M2Edge
Input price / 1M$5.15$5.19A
Output price / 1M$24.32$22.73B
Context window1,000,000200,000A
Max output128,00065,536A
Average score80.480.6B
Arena Elo1426.61423.8A
Open weightsYesYesTie

Benchmark comparison

GLM-4.6 Instruct wins 8, MiniMax-M2 wins 4, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGLM-4.6 InstructMiniMax-M2GapWinner
MMLU-Pro80.681.81.2MiniMax-M2
GPQA Diamond75.875.40.4GLM-4.6 Instruct
SWE-bench Verified70.569.90.6GLM-4.6 Instruct
HumanEval85.388.02.7MiniMax-M2
MATH-50084.982.32.6GLM-4.6 Instruct
AIME 202574.578.13.6MiniMax-M2
LiveCodeBench72.673.40.8MiniMax-M2
IFEval87.486.11.3GLM-4.6 Instruct
TruthfulQA83.883.50.3GLM-4.6 Instruct
HellaSwag90.690.40.2GLM-4.6 Instruct
MMMU78.978.00.9GLM-4.6 Instruct
Arena Elo1426.61423.82.8GLM-4.6 Instruct

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GLM-4.6 Instruct costs about $9.94 per million tokens and MiniMax-M2 costs about $9.57. MiniMax-M2 is roughly 4% cheaper than GLM-4.6 Instruct. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GLM-4.6 Instruct has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for MiniMax-M2. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GLM-4.6 Instruct wins 8, MiniMax-M2 wins 4, and 0 are tied. On the index average, MiniMax-M2 leads GLM-4.6 Instruct by 0.2 points (80.6 versus 80.4).

The price picture favours MiniMax-M2. The context picture favours GLM-4.6 Instruct. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with MiniMax-M2 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose GLM-4.6 Instruct if

  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose MiniMax-M2 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is GLM-4.6 Instruct better than MiniMax-M2?

On the index average, MiniMax-M2 leads GLM-4.6 Instruct by 0.2 points (80.6 versus 80.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GLM-4.6 Instruct wins 8 benchmarks, MiniMax-M2 wins 4.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6 Instruct or MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $9.57 per million tokens, versus $9.94 for GLM-4.6 Instruct.

Which has the larger context window?

GLM-4.6 Instruct has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. MiniMax-M2 has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GLM-4.6 Instruct is open weights; MiniMax-M2 is open weights.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with MiniMax-M2 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons