Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

GLM-4.6 vs GLM-4.6 Instruct: which model should you choose?

We compared GLM-4.6 and GLM-4.6 Instruct on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GLM-4.6 Instruct has the stronger average benchmark score; GLM-4.6 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Zhipu AI

GLM-4.6

GLM-4.6 is a multimodal model from Zhipu AI. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $5.10 per million input tokens and $18.45 per million output tokens, and averages 80.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.10 / 1M
Output
$18.45 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
80.2
Open weights
Yes
Full GLM-4.6 page
Zhipu AI

GLM-4.6 Instruct

GLM-4.6 Instruct is a multimodal model from Zhipu AI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $5.15 per million input tokens and $24.32 per million output tokens, and averages 80.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.15 / 1M
Output
$24.32 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
80.4
Open weights
Yes
Full GLM-4.6 Instruct page

Specification comparison

SpecGLM-4.6GLM-4.6 InstructEdge
Input price / 1M$5.10$5.15A
Output price / 1M$18.45$24.32A
Context window128,0001,000,000B
Max output8,192128,000B
Average score80.280.4B
Arena Elo1440.71426.6A
Open weightsYesYesTie

Benchmark comparison

GLM-4.6 wins 4, GLM-4.6 Instruct wins 8, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGLM-4.6GLM-4.6 InstructGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.080.63.4GLM-4.6
GPQA Diamond78.375.82.5GLM-4.6
SWE-bench Verified67.470.53.1GLM-4.6 Instruct
HumanEval83.885.31.5GLM-4.6 Instruct
MATH-50083.484.91.5GLM-4.6 Instruct
AIME 202580.274.55.7GLM-4.6
LiveCodeBench71.672.61.0GLM-4.6 Instruct
IFEval86.487.41.0GLM-4.6 Instruct
TruthfulQA82.583.81.3GLM-4.6 Instruct
HellaSwag89.490.61.2GLM-4.6 Instruct
MMMU75.478.93.5GLM-4.6 Instruct
Arena Elo1440.71426.614.1GLM-4.6

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GLM-4.6 costs about $8.44 per million tokens and GLM-4.6 Instruct costs about $9.94. GLM-4.6 is roughly 15% cheaper than GLM-4.6 Instruct. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GLM-4.6 Instruct has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for GLM-4.6. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GLM-4.6 wins 4, GLM-4.6 Instruct wins 8, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GLM-4.6 Instruct leads GLM-4.6 by 0.2 points (80.4 versus 80.2).

The price picture favours GLM-4.6. The context picture favours GLM-4.6 Instruct. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GLM-4.6 Instruct for quality-sensitive work and GLM-4.6 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose GLM-4.6 if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose GLM-4.6 Instruct if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

FAQ

Is GLM-4.6 better than GLM-4.6 Instruct?

On the index average, GLM-4.6 Instruct leads GLM-4.6 by 0.2 points (80.4 versus 80.2). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GLM-4.6 wins 4 benchmarks, GLM-4.6 Instruct wins 8.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6 or GLM-4.6 Instruct?

GLM-4.6 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $8.44 per million tokens, versus $9.94 for GLM-4.6 Instruct.

Which has the larger context window?

GLM-4.6 Instruct has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. GLM-4.6 has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GLM-4.6 is open weights; GLM-4.6 Instruct is open weights.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GLM-4.6 Instruct for quality-sensitive work and GLM-4.6 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons