Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-4.1 Max vs GPT-4.1 Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-4.1 Max and GPT-4.1 Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-4.1 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-4.1 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Max

GPT-4.1 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $17.34 per million input tokens and $66.38 per million output tokens, and averages 84.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.34 / 1M
Output
$66.38 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
84.7
Open weights
No
Full GPT-4.1 Max page
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Reasoning

GPT-4.1 Reasoning is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $16.97 per million input tokens and $82.05 per million output tokens, and averages 83.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.97 / 1M
Output
$82.05 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
83.8
Open weights
No
Full GPT-4.1 Reasoning page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-4.1 MaxGPT-4.1 ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$17.34$16.97B
Output price / 1M$66.38$82.05A
Context window400,0001,000,000B
Max output8,1924,096A
Average score84.783.8A
Arena Elo1467.61466.7A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-4.1 Max wins 9, GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 2, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MaxGPT-4.1 ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.487.30.1GPT-4.1 Max
GPQA Diamond81.277.83.4GPT-4.1 Max
SWE-bench Verified74.873.11.7GPT-4.1 Max
HumanEval88.888.80.0Tie
MATH-50087.389.11.8GPT-4.1 Reasoning
AIME 202584.982.12.8GPT-4.1 Max
LiveCodeBench78.580.52.0GPT-4.1 Reasoning
IFEval92.191.60.5GPT-4.1 Max
TruthfulQA85.484.31.1GPT-4.1 Max
HellaSwag90.789.41.3GPT-4.1 Max
MMMU80.577.53.0GPT-4.1 Max
Arena Elo1467.61466.70.9GPT-4.1 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-4.1 Max costs about $29.60 per million tokens and GPT-4.1 Reasoning costs about $33.24. GPT-4.1 Max is roughly 11% cheaper than GPT-4.1 Reasoning. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-4.1 Reasoning has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for GPT-4.1 Max. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Max wins 9, GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 2, and 1 are tied. On the index average, GPT-4.1 Max leads GPT-4.1 Reasoning by 0.9 points (84.7 versus 83.8).

The price picture favours GPT-4.1 Max. The context picture favours GPT-4.1 Reasoning. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-4.1 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose GPT-4.1 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 8,192-token output limit.

Choose GPT-4.1 Reasoning if

  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is GPT-4.1 Max better than GPT-4.1 Reasoning?

On the index average, GPT-4.1 Max leads GPT-4.1 Reasoning by 0.9 points (84.7 versus 83.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-4.1 Max wins 9 benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 2.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Max or GPT-4.1 Reasoning?

GPT-4.1 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $29.60 per million tokens, versus $33.24 for GPT-4.1 Reasoning.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4.1 Reasoning has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. GPT-4.1 Max has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-4.1 Max is proprietary; GPT-4.1 Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-4.1 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons