Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-4.1 Max vs o3 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-4.1 Max and o3 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. o3 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-4.1 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Max

GPT-4.1 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $17.34 per million input tokens and $66.38 per million output tokens, and averages 84.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.34 / 1M
Output
$66.38 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
84.7
Open weights
No
Full GPT-4.1 Max page
OpenAI

o3 Max

o3 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $17.82 per million input tokens and $90.55 per million output tokens, and averages 84.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.82 / 1M
Output
$90.55 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
84.8
Open weights
No
Full o3 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-4.1 Maxo3 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$17.34$17.82A
Output price / 1M$66.38$90.55A
Context window400,0002,000,000B
Max output8,192128,000B
Average score84.784.8B
Arena Elo1467.61465.2A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-4.1 Max wins 5, o3 Max wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 Maxo3 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.484.92.5GPT-4.1 Max
GPQA Diamond81.282.71.5o3 Max
SWE-bench Verified74.871.83.0GPT-4.1 Max
HumanEval88.889.81.0o3 Max
MATH-50087.387.00.3GPT-4.1 Max
AIME 202584.986.21.3o3 Max
LiveCodeBench78.576.42.1GPT-4.1 Max
IFEval92.192.50.4o3 Max
TruthfulQA85.487.31.9o3 Max
HellaSwag90.793.42.7o3 Max
MMMU80.580.80.3o3 Max
Arena Elo1467.61465.22.4GPT-4.1 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-4.1 Max costs about $29.60 per million tokens and o3 Max costs about $36.00. GPT-4.1 Max is roughly 18% cheaper than o3 Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

o3 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for GPT-4.1 Max. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Max wins 5, o3 Max wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, o3 Max leads GPT-4.1 Max by 0.1 points (84.8 versus 84.7).

The price picture favours GPT-4.1 Max. The context picture favours o3 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with o3 Max for quality-sensitive work and GPT-4.1 Max for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose GPT-4.1 Max if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose o3 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

FAQ

Is GPT-4.1 Max better than o3 Max?

On the index average, o3 Max leads GPT-4.1 Max by 0.1 points (84.8 versus 84.7). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-4.1 Max wins 5 benchmarks, o3 Max wins 7.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Max or o3 Max?

GPT-4.1 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $29.60 per million tokens, versus $36.00 for o3 Max.

Which has the larger context window?

o3 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. GPT-4.1 Max has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-4.1 Max is proprietary; o3 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with o3 Max for quality-sensitive work and GPT-4.1 Max for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons