Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-4.1 Max vs o4 Vision: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-4.1 Max and o4 Vision on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-4.1 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-4.1 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Max

GPT-4.1 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $17.34 per million input tokens and $66.38 per million output tokens, and averages 84.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.34 / 1M
Output
$66.38 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
84.7
Open weights
No
Full GPT-4.1 Max page
OpenAI

o4 Vision

o4 Vision is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $17.01 per million input tokens and $90.05 per million output tokens, and averages 84.5 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.01 / 1M
Output
$90.05 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
84.5
Open weights
No
Full o4 Vision page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-4.1 Maxo4 VisionEdge
Input price / 1M$17.34$17.01B
Output price / 1M$66.38$90.05A
Context window400,000200,000A
Max output8,1924,096A
Average score84.784.5A
Arena Elo1467.61473.2B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-4.1 Max wins 5, o4 Vision wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 Maxo4 VisionGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.484.23.2GPT-4.1 Max
GPQA Diamond81.280.90.3GPT-4.1 Max
SWE-bench Verified74.875.60.8o4 Vision
HumanEval88.888.90.1o4 Vision
MATH-50087.391.74.4o4 Vision
AIME 202584.980.44.5GPT-4.1 Max
LiveCodeBench78.581.32.8o4 Vision
IFEval92.189.13.0GPT-4.1 Max
TruthfulQA85.485.30.1GPT-4.1 Max
HellaSwag90.791.20.5o4 Vision
MMMU80.580.70.2o4 Vision
Arena Elo1467.61473.25.6o4 Vision

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-4.1 Max costs about $29.60 per million tokens and o4 Vision costs about $35.27. GPT-4.1 Max is roughly 16% cheaper than o4 Vision. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-4.1 Max has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for o4 Vision. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Max wins 5, o4 Vision wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-4.1 Max leads o4 Vision by 0.2 points (84.7 versus 84.5).

The price picture favours GPT-4.1 Max. The context picture favours GPT-4.1 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-4.1 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose GPT-4.1 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 400,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 8,192-token output limit.

Choose o4 Vision if

  • You prefer OpenAI's tooling or already use it.

FAQ

Is GPT-4.1 Max better than o4 Vision?

On the index average, GPT-4.1 Max leads o4 Vision by 0.2 points (84.7 versus 84.5). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-4.1 Max wins 5 benchmarks, o4 Vision wins 7.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Max or o4 Vision?

GPT-4.1 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $29.60 per million tokens, versus $35.27 for o4 Vision.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4.1 Max has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens. o4 Vision has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-4.1 Max is proprietary; o4 Vision is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-4.1 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons