Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-4.1 Reasoning vs Grok 3 Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-4.1 Reasoning and Grok 3 Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-4.1 Reasoning and Grok 3 Pro are effectively tied on the index average; Grok 3 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Reasoning

GPT-4.1 Reasoning is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $16.97 per million input tokens and $82.05 per million output tokens, and averages 83.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.97 / 1M
Output
$82.05 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
83.8
Open weights
No
Full GPT-4.1 Reasoning page
xAI

Grok 3 Pro

Grok 3 Pro is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $16.61 per million input tokens and $73.49 per million output tokens, and averages 83.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.61 / 1M
Output
$73.49 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
83.8
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-4.1 ReasoningGrok 3 ProEdge
Input price / 1M$16.97$16.61B
Output price / 1M$82.05$73.49B
Context window1,000,000400,000A
Max output4,0964,096Tie
Average score83.883.8Tie
Arena Elo1466.71448.4A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 5, Grok 3 Pro wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 ReasoningGrok 3 ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.383.53.8GPT-4.1 Reasoning
GPQA Diamond77.881.33.5Grok 3 Pro
SWE-bench Verified73.171.41.7GPT-4.1 Reasoning
HumanEval88.889.91.1Grok 3 Pro
MATH-50089.187.02.1GPT-4.1 Reasoning
AIME 202582.185.53.4Grok 3 Pro
LiveCodeBench80.580.70.2Grok 3 Pro
IFEval91.688.63.0GPT-4.1 Reasoning
TruthfulQA84.384.60.3Grok 3 Pro
HellaSwag89.490.71.3Grok 3 Pro
MMMU77.578.91.4Grok 3 Pro
Arena Elo1466.71448.418.3GPT-4.1 Reasoning

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-4.1 Reasoning costs about $33.24 per million tokens and Grok 3 Pro costs about $30.83. Grok 3 Pro is roughly 7% cheaper than GPT-4.1 Reasoning. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-4.1 Reasoning has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Grok 3 Pro. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 5, Grok 3 Pro wins 7, and 0 are tied. The two models are effectively tied on the index average at 83.8.

The price picture favours Grok 3 Pro. The context picture favours GPT-4.1 Reasoning. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Pro if cost is the constraint and GPT-4.1 Reasoning if context is the constraint. Test both on a sample of your own traffic before committing.

Choose GPT-4.1 Reasoning if

  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.

Choose Grok 3 Pro if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is GPT-4.1 Reasoning better than Grok 3 Pro?

The two models are effectively tied on the index average at 83.8. The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 5 benchmarks, Grok 3 Pro wins 7.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Reasoning or Grok 3 Pro?

Grok 3 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $30.83 per million tokens, versus $33.24 for GPT-4.1 Reasoning.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4.1 Reasoning has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 3 Pro has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-4.1 Reasoning is proprietary; Grok 3 Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Pro if cost is the constraint and GPT-4.1 Reasoning if context is the constraint. Test both on a sample of your own traffic before committing.

Related comparisons