GPT-4.1 Reasoning vs o3 Turbo: which model should you choose?
We compared GPT-4.1 Reasoning and o3 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-4.1 Reasoning has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-4.1 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.
GPT-4.1 Reasoning
GPT-4.1 Reasoning is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $16.97 per million input tokens and $82.05 per million output tokens, and averages 83.8 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $16.97 / 1M
- Output
- $82.05 / 1M
- Context
- 1,000,000
- Avg score
- 83.8
- Open weights
- No
o3 Turbo
o3 Turbo is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $16.63 per million input tokens and $83.71 per million output tokens, and averages 83.4 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $16.63 / 1M
- Output
- $83.71 / 1M
- Context
- 200,000
- Avg score
- 83.4
- Open weights
- No
Specification comparison
| Spec | GPT-4.1 Reasoning | o3 Turbo | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $16.97 | $16.63 | B |
| Output price / 1M | $82.05 | $83.71 | A |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 200,000 | A |
| Max output | 4,096 | 4,096 | Tie |
| Average score | 83.8 | 83.4 | A |
| Arena Elo | 1466.7 | 1456.2 | A |
| Open weights | No | No | Tie |
Benchmark comparison
GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 7, o3 Turbo wins 5, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Reasoning | o3 Turbo | Gap | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 87.3 | 82.7 | 4.6 | GPT-4.1 Reasoning |
| GPQA Diamond | 77.8 | 77.7 | 0.1 | GPT-4.1 Reasoning |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.1 | 70.7 | 2.4 | GPT-4.1 Reasoning |
| HumanEval | 88.8 | 87.4 | 1.4 | GPT-4.1 Reasoning |
| MATH-500 | 89.1 | 90.6 | 1.5 | o3 Turbo |
| AIME 2025 | 82.1 | 83.0 | 0.9 | o3 Turbo |
| LiveCodeBench | 80.5 | 80.7 | 0.2 | o3 Turbo |
| IFEval | 91.6 | 89.1 | 2.5 | GPT-4.1 Reasoning |
| TruthfulQA | 84.3 | 83.6 | 0.7 | GPT-4.1 Reasoning |
| HellaSwag | 89.4 | 91.8 | 2.4 | o3 Turbo |
| MMMU | 77.5 | 79.7 | 2.2 | o3 Turbo |
| Arena Elo | 1466.7 | 1456.2 | 10.5 | GPT-4.1 Reasoning |
Price analysis
On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-4.1 Reasoning costs about $33.24 per million tokens and o3 Turbo costs about $33.40. GPT-4.1 Reasoning is roughly 0% cheaper than o3 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.
GPT-4.1 Reasoning has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for o3 Turbo. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.
Verdict
Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 7, o3 Turbo wins 5, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-4.1 Reasoning leads o3 Turbo by 0.4 points (83.8 versus 83.4).
The price picture favours GPT-4.1 Reasoning. The context picture favours GPT-4.1 Reasoning. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.
If you need a single default, start with GPT-4.1 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.
Choose GPT-4.1 Reasoning if
- You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
- Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
- You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
Choose o3 Turbo if
- You prefer OpenAI's tooling or already use it.
FAQ
Is GPT-4.1 Reasoning better than o3 Turbo?
On the index average, GPT-4.1 Reasoning leads o3 Turbo by 0.4 points (83.8 versus 83.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 7 benchmarks, o3 Turbo wins 5.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Reasoning or o3 Turbo?
GPT-4.1 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $33.24 per million tokens, versus $33.40 for o3 Turbo.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-4.1 Reasoning has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. o3 Turbo has 200,000 tokens.
Are these models open weights?
GPT-4.1 Reasoning is proprietary; o3 Turbo is proprietary.
Which should I choose for production?
If you need a single default, start with GPT-4.1 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.