Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-4.1 Reasoning vs Qwen3-Max: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-4.1 Reasoning and Qwen3-Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Qwen3-Max has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-4.1 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Reasoning

GPT-4.1 Reasoning is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $16.97 per million input tokens and $82.05 per million output tokens, and averages 83.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.97 / 1M
Output
$82.05 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
83.8
Open weights
No
Full GPT-4.1 Reasoning page
Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3-Max

Qwen3-Max is a frontier model from Alibaba Cloud. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $17.37 per million input tokens and $94.30 per million output tokens, and averages 84.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.37 / 1M
Output
$94.30 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
84.4
Open weights
No
Full Qwen3-Max page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-4.1 ReasoningQwen3-MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$16.97$17.37A
Output price / 1M$82.05$94.30A
Context window1,000,000400,000A
Max output4,0964,096Tie
Average score83.884.4B
Arena Elo1466.71449.2A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 5, Qwen3-Max wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 ReasoningQwen3-MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.384.03.3GPT-4.1 Reasoning
GPQA Diamond77.882.34.5Qwen3-Max
SWE-bench Verified73.173.30.2Qwen3-Max
HumanEval88.888.50.3GPT-4.1 Reasoning
MATH-50089.189.70.6Qwen3-Max
AIME 202582.181.11.0GPT-4.1 Reasoning
LiveCodeBench80.582.21.7Qwen3-Max
IFEval91.692.50.9Qwen3-Max
TruthfulQA84.383.40.9GPT-4.1 Reasoning
HellaSwag89.492.93.5Qwen3-Max
MMMU77.578.71.2Qwen3-Max
Arena Elo1466.71449.217.5GPT-4.1 Reasoning

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-4.1 Reasoning costs about $33.24 per million tokens and Qwen3-Max costs about $36.60. GPT-4.1 Reasoning is roughly 9% cheaper than Qwen3-Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-4.1 Reasoning has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Qwen3-Max. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 5, Qwen3-Max wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Qwen3-Max leads GPT-4.1 Reasoning by 0.6 points (84.4 versus 83.8).

The price picture favours GPT-4.1 Reasoning. The context picture favours GPT-4.1 Reasoning. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Qwen3-Max for quality-sensitive work and GPT-4.1 Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose GPT-4.1 Reasoning if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.

Choose Qwen3-Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

FAQ

Is GPT-4.1 Reasoning better than Qwen3-Max?

On the index average, Qwen3-Max leads GPT-4.1 Reasoning by 0.6 points (84.4 versus 83.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-4.1 Reasoning wins 5 benchmarks, Qwen3-Max wins 7.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Reasoning or Qwen3-Max?

GPT-4.1 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $33.24 per million tokens, versus $36.60 for Qwen3-Max.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4.1 Reasoning has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3-Max has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-4.1 Reasoning is proprietary; Qwen3-Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Qwen3-Max for quality-sensitive work and GPT-4.1 Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons