Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-4.1 Turbo vs Grok 3 Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-4.1 Turbo and Grok 3 Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 3 Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-4.1 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Turbo

GPT-4.1 Turbo is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $16.12 per million input tokens and $69.91 per million output tokens, and averages 82.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.12 / 1M
Output
$69.91 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
82.9
Open weights
No
Full GPT-4.1 Turbo page
xAI

Grok 3 Pro

Grok 3 Pro is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $16.61 per million input tokens and $73.49 per million output tokens, and averages 83.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.61 / 1M
Output
$73.49 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
83.8
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-4.1 TurboGrok 3 ProEdge
Input price / 1M$16.12$16.61A
Output price / 1M$69.91$73.49A
Context window1,000,000400,000A
Max output128,0004,096A
Average score82.983.8B
Arena Elo1446.21448.4B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-4.1 Turbo wins 3, Grok 3 Pro wins 9, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 TurboGrok 3 ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.683.51.1GPT-4.1 Turbo
GPQA Diamond76.181.35.2Grok 3 Pro
SWE-bench Verified74.771.43.3GPT-4.1 Turbo
HumanEval89.889.90.1Grok 3 Pro
MATH-50086.987.00.1Grok 3 Pro
AIME 202577.485.58.1Grok 3 Pro
LiveCodeBench78.780.72.0Grok 3 Pro
IFEval88.288.60.4Grok 3 Pro
TruthfulQA87.084.62.4GPT-4.1 Turbo
HellaSwag90.090.70.7Grok 3 Pro
MMMU78.578.90.4Grok 3 Pro
Arena Elo1446.21448.42.2Grok 3 Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-4.1 Turbo costs about $29.57 per million tokens and Grok 3 Pro costs about $30.83. GPT-4.1 Turbo is roughly 4% cheaper than Grok 3 Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-4.1 Turbo has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Grok 3 Pro. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Turbo wins 3, Grok 3 Pro wins 9, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 3 Pro leads GPT-4.1 Turbo by 0.9 points (83.8 versus 82.9).

The price picture favours GPT-4.1 Turbo. The context picture favours GPT-4.1 Turbo. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Pro for quality-sensitive work and GPT-4.1 Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose GPT-4.1 Turbo if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose Grok 3 Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

FAQ

Is GPT-4.1 Turbo better than Grok 3 Pro?

On the index average, Grok 3 Pro leads GPT-4.1 Turbo by 0.9 points (83.8 versus 82.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-4.1 Turbo wins 3 benchmarks, Grok 3 Pro wins 9.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Turbo or Grok 3 Pro?

GPT-4.1 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $29.57 per million tokens, versus $30.83 for Grok 3 Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4.1 Turbo has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 3 Pro has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-4.1 Turbo is proprietary; Grok 3 Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Pro for quality-sensitive work and GPT-4.1 Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons