Head-to-head · frontier vs multimodal

GPT-4.1 Turbo vs Grok 3 Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-4.1 Turbo and Grok 3 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 3 Turbo has the stronger average benchmark score; Grok 3 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Turbo

GPT-4.1 Turbo is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $16.12 per million input tokens and $69.91 per million output tokens, and averages 82.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.12 / 1M
Output
$69.91 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
82.9
Open weights
No
Full GPT-4.1 Turbo page
xAI

Grok 3 Turbo

Grok 3 Turbo is a multimodal model from xAI. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $15.97 per million input tokens and $70.13 per million output tokens, and averages 83.1 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$15.97 / 1M
Output
$70.13 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
83.1
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-4.1 TurboGrok 3 TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$16.12$15.97B
Output price / 1M$69.91$70.13A
Context window1,000,000128,000A
Max output128,00065,536A
Average score82.983.1B
Arena Elo1446.21438.4A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-4.1 Turbo wins 7, Grok 3 Turbo wins 5, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 TurboGrok 3 TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.683.70.9GPT-4.1 Turbo
GPQA Diamond76.179.13.0Grok 3 Turbo
SWE-bench Verified74.771.43.3GPT-4.1 Turbo
HumanEval89.886.83.0GPT-4.1 Turbo
MATH-50086.985.61.3GPT-4.1 Turbo
AIME 202577.483.15.7Grok 3 Turbo
LiveCodeBench78.776.42.3GPT-4.1 Turbo
IFEval88.290.72.5Grok 3 Turbo
TruthfulQA87.086.01.0GPT-4.1 Turbo
HellaSwag90.090.20.2Grok 3 Turbo
MMMU78.581.32.8Grok 3 Turbo
Arena Elo1446.21438.47.8GPT-4.1 Turbo

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-4.1 Turbo costs about $29.57 per million tokens and Grok 3 Turbo costs about $29.51. Grok 3 Turbo is roughly 0% cheaper than GPT-4.1 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-4.1 Turbo has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for Grok 3 Turbo. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Turbo wins 7, Grok 3 Turbo wins 5, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 3 Turbo leads GPT-4.1 Turbo by 0.2 points (83.1 versus 82.9).

The price picture favours Grok 3 Turbo. The context picture favours GPT-4.1 Turbo. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Turbo for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose GPT-4.1 Turbo if

  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose Grok 3 Turbo if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is GPT-4.1 Turbo better than Grok 3 Turbo?

On the index average, Grok 3 Turbo leads GPT-4.1 Turbo by 0.2 points (83.1 versus 82.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-4.1 Turbo wins 7 benchmarks, Grok 3 Turbo wins 5.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Turbo or Grok 3 Turbo?

Grok 3 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $29.51 per million tokens, versus $29.57 for GPT-4.1 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4.1 Turbo has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 3 Turbo has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-4.1 Turbo is proprietary; Grok 3 Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Turbo for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons