Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-5.1 Max vs GPT-5.2 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-5.1 Max and GPT-5.2 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.2 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-5.2 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Max

GPT-5.1 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $20.50 per million input tokens and $103.98 per million output tokens, and averages 87.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$20.50 / 1M
Output
$103.98 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
87.9
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Max page
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Max

GPT-5.2 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $21.39 per million input tokens and $90.69 per million output tokens, and averages 89.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$21.39 / 1M
Output
$90.69 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
89.2
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.2 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-5.1 MaxGPT-5.2 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$20.50$21.39A
Output price / 1M$103.98$90.69B
Context window2,000,0001,000,000A
Max output8,192128,000B
Average score87.989.2B
Arena Elo1478.21495.3B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-5.1 Max wins 4, GPT-5.2 Max wins 8, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-5.1 MaxGPT-5.2 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro91.387.63.7GPT-5.1 Max
GPQA Diamond86.483.43.0GPT-5.1 Max
SWE-bench Verified75.680.54.9GPT-5.2 Max
HumanEval92.293.61.4GPT-5.2 Max
MATH-50091.396.75.4GPT-5.2 Max
AIME 202588.888.20.6GPT-5.1 Max
LiveCodeBench80.284.84.6GPT-5.2 Max
IFEval92.295.23.0GPT-5.2 Max
TruthfulQA91.188.13.0GPT-5.1 Max
HellaSwag93.196.13.0GPT-5.2 Max
MMMU85.186.91.8GPT-5.2 Max
Arena Elo1478.21495.317.1GPT-5.2 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-5.1 Max costs about $41.37 per million tokens and GPT-5.2 Max costs about $38.72. GPT-5.2 Max is roughly 6% cheaper than GPT-5.1 Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-5.1 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 for GPT-5.2 Max. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Max wins 4, GPT-5.2 Max wins 8, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.2 Max leads GPT-5.1 Max by 1.3 points (89.2 versus 87.9).

The price picture favours GPT-5.2 Max. The context picture favours GPT-5.1 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.2 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose GPT-5.1 Max if

  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.

Choose GPT-5.2 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.1 Max better than GPT-5.2 Max?

On the index average, GPT-5.2 Max leads GPT-5.1 Max by 1.3 points (89.2 versus 87.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-5.1 Max wins 4 benchmarks, GPT-5.2 Max wins 8.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 Max or GPT-5.2 Max?

GPT-5.2 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $38.72 per million tokens, versus $41.37 for GPT-5.1 Max.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.1 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. GPT-5.2 Max has 1,000,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-5.1 Max is proprietary; GPT-5.2 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.2 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons