Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-5.1 Max vs Grok 4 Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-5.1 Max and Grok 4 Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.1 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; Grok 4 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Max

GPT-5.1 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $20.50 per million input tokens and $103.98 per million output tokens, and averages 87.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$20.50 / 1M
Output
$103.98 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
87.9
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Max page
xAI

Grok 4 Reasoning

Grok 4 Reasoning is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.67 per million input tokens and $93.29 per million output tokens, and averages 87.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.67 / 1M
Output
$93.29 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
87.8
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 Reasoning page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-5.1 MaxGrok 4 ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$20.50$19.67B
Output price / 1M$103.98$93.29B
Context window2,000,0002,000,000Tie
Max output8,19265,536B
Average score87.987.8A
Arena Elo1478.21487.6B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-5.1 Max wins 5, Grok 4 Reasoning wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-5.1 MaxGrok 4 ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro91.388.52.8GPT-5.1 Max
GPQA Diamond86.481.94.5GPT-5.1 Max
SWE-bench Verified75.678.02.4Grok 4 Reasoning
HumanEval92.293.81.6Grok 4 Reasoning
MATH-50091.394.43.1Grok 4 Reasoning
AIME 202588.885.63.2GPT-5.1 Max
LiveCodeBench80.285.14.9Grok 4 Reasoning
IFEval92.293.41.2Grok 4 Reasoning
TruthfulQA91.189.41.7GPT-5.1 Max
HellaSwag93.195.22.1Grok 4 Reasoning
MMMU85.180.84.3GPT-5.1 Max
Arena Elo1478.21487.69.4Grok 4 Reasoning

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-5.1 Max costs about $41.37 per million tokens and Grok 4 Reasoning costs about $38.08. Grok 4 Reasoning is roughly 8% cheaper than GPT-5.1 Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 2,000,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Max wins 5, Grok 4 Reasoning wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.1 Max leads Grok 4 Reasoning by 0.1 points (87.9 versus 87.8).

The price picture favours Grok 4 Reasoning. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Max for quality-sensitive work and Grok 4 Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose GPT-5.1 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

Choose Grok 4 Reasoning if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.1 Max better than Grok 4 Reasoning?

On the index average, GPT-5.1 Max leads Grok 4 Reasoning by 0.1 points (87.9 versus 87.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-5.1 Max wins 5 benchmarks, Grok 4 Reasoning wins 7.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 Max or Grok 4 Reasoning?

Grok 4 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $38.08 per million tokens, versus $41.37 for GPT-5.1 Max.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 2,000,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-5.1 Max is proprietary; Grok 4 Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Max for quality-sensitive work and Grok 4 Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons