Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-5.1 Pro vs o4 Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-5.1 Pro and o4 Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.1 Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-5.1 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Pro

GPT-5.1 Pro is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $19.77 per million input tokens and $100.32 per million output tokens, and averages 87.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.77 / 1M
Output
$100.32 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
87.8
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Pro page
OpenAI

o4 Reasoning

o4 Reasoning is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $19.69 per million input tokens and $103.53 per million output tokens, and averages 87.5 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.69 / 1M
Output
$103.53 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
87.5
Open weights
No
Full o4 Reasoning page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-5.1 Proo4 ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$19.77$19.69B
Output price / 1M$100.32$103.53A
Context window200,0001,000,000B
Max output32,768128,000B
Average score87.887.5A
Arena Elo1490.01472.2A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-5.1 Pro wins 8, o4 Reasoning wins 4, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-5.1 Proo4 ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro86.286.10.1GPT-5.1 Pro
GPQA Diamond83.484.00.6o4 Reasoning
SWE-bench Verified80.176.43.7GPT-5.1 Pro
HumanEval91.190.20.9GPT-5.1 Pro
MATH-50095.194.80.3GPT-5.1 Pro
AIME 202590.690.30.3GPT-5.1 Pro
LiveCodeBench82.283.41.2o4 Reasoning
IFEval94.894.50.3GPT-5.1 Pro
TruthfulQA86.989.02.1o4 Reasoning
HellaSwag93.892.41.4GPT-5.1 Pro
MMMU81.681.80.2o4 Reasoning
Arena Elo1490.01472.217.8GPT-5.1 Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-5.1 Pro costs about $39.91 per million tokens and o4 Reasoning costs about $40.65. GPT-5.1 Pro is roughly 2% cheaper than o4 Reasoning. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

o4 Reasoning has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for GPT-5.1 Pro. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Pro wins 8, o4 Reasoning wins 4, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.1 Pro leads o4 Reasoning by 0.3 points (87.8 versus 87.5).

The price picture favours GPT-5.1 Pro. The context picture favours o4 Reasoning. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose GPT-5.1 Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose o4 Reasoning if

  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.1 Pro better than o4 Reasoning?

On the index average, GPT-5.1 Pro leads o4 Reasoning by 0.3 points (87.8 versus 87.5). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-5.1 Pro wins 8 benchmarks, o4 Reasoning wins 4.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 Pro or o4 Reasoning?

GPT-5.1 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $39.91 per million tokens, versus $40.65 for o4 Reasoning.

Which has the larger context window?

o4 Reasoning has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. GPT-5.1 Pro has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-5.1 Pro is proprietary; o4 Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons