Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-5.1 Reasoning vs GPT-5.2: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-5.1 Reasoning and GPT-5.2 on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.1 Reasoning has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-5.1 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Reasoning

GPT-5.1 Reasoning is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $20.27 per million input tokens and $82.11 per million output tokens, and averages 88.3 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$20.27 / 1M
Output
$82.11 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
88.3
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Reasoning page
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.71 per million input tokens and $85.71 per million output tokens, and averages 88.0 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.71 / 1M
Output
$85.71 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
88.0
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.2 page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-5.1 ReasoningGPT-5.2Edge
Input price / 1M$20.27$19.71B
Output price / 1M$82.11$85.71A
Context window400,0002,000,000B
Max output128,00016,384A
Average score88.388.0A
Arena Elo1485.91478.0A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-5.1 Reasoning wins 10, GPT-5.2 wins 2, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-5.1 ReasoningGPT-5.2GapWinner
MMLU-Pro90.089.90.1GPT-5.1 Reasoning
GPQA Diamond85.684.90.7GPT-5.1 Reasoning
SWE-bench Verified76.080.24.2GPT-5.2
HumanEval92.991.01.9GPT-5.1 Reasoning
MATH-50095.990.65.3GPT-5.1 Reasoning
AIME 202585.090.65.6GPT-5.2
LiveCodeBench80.979.71.2GPT-5.1 Reasoning
IFEval94.693.61.0GPT-5.1 Reasoning
TruthfulQA90.089.70.3GPT-5.1 Reasoning
HellaSwag94.492.61.8GPT-5.1 Reasoning
MMMU86.285.30.9GPT-5.1 Reasoning
Arena Elo1485.91478.07.9GPT-5.1 Reasoning

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-5.1 Reasoning costs about $35.73 per million tokens and GPT-5.2 costs about $36.21. GPT-5.1 Reasoning is roughly 1% cheaper than GPT-5.2. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-5.2 has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for GPT-5.1 Reasoning. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Reasoning wins 10, GPT-5.2 wins 2, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.1 Reasoning leads GPT-5.2 by 0.3 points (88.3 versus 88.0).

The price picture favours GPT-5.1 Reasoning. The context picture favours GPT-5.2. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose GPT-5.1 Reasoning if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose GPT-5.2 if

  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.1 Reasoning better than GPT-5.2?

On the index average, GPT-5.1 Reasoning leads GPT-5.2 by 0.3 points (88.3 versus 88.0). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-5.1 Reasoning wins 10 benchmarks, GPT-5.2 wins 2.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 Reasoning or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.1 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $35.73 per million tokens, versus $36.21 for GPT-5.2.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.2 has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. GPT-5.1 Reasoning has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-5.1 Reasoning is proprietary; GPT-5.2 is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons