Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-5.1 Turbo vs Grok 4 Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-5.1 Turbo and Grok 4 Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.1 Turbo has the stronger average benchmark score; Grok 4 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Turbo

GPT-5.1 Turbo is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.19 per million input tokens and $89.83 per million output tokens, and averages 86.1 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.19 / 1M
Output
$89.83 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.1
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Turbo page
xAI

Grok 4 Pro

Grok 4 Pro is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $19.00 per million input tokens and $77.72 per million output tokens, and averages 85.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.00 / 1M
Output
$77.72 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
85.4
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-5.1 TurboGrok 4 ProEdge
Input price / 1M$19.19$19.00B
Output price / 1M$89.83$77.72B
Context window2,000,0001,000,000A
Max output128,000128,000Tie
Average score86.185.4A
Arena Elo1482.01487.5B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-5.1 Turbo wins 6, Grok 4 Pro wins 5, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-5.1 TurboGrok 4 ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro85.284.90.3GPT-5.1 Turbo
GPQA Diamond81.379.22.1GPT-5.1 Turbo
SWE-bench Verified74.774.70.0Tie
HumanEval91.589.71.8GPT-5.1 Turbo
MATH-50091.492.30.9Grok 4 Pro
AIME 202584.785.40.7Grok 4 Pro
LiveCodeBench84.677.86.8GPT-5.1 Turbo
IFEval93.491.32.1GPT-5.1 Turbo
TruthfulQA89.286.03.2GPT-5.1 Turbo
HellaSwag91.392.81.5Grok 4 Pro
MMMU79.784.95.2Grok 4 Pro
Arena Elo1482.01487.55.5Grok 4 Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-5.1 Turbo costs about $36.85 per million tokens and Grok 4 Pro costs about $33.68. Grok 4 Pro is roughly 9% cheaper than GPT-5.1 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-5.1 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 for Grok 4 Pro. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Turbo wins 6, Grok 4 Pro wins 5, and 1 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.1 Turbo leads Grok 4 Pro by 0.7 points (86.1 versus 85.4).

The price picture favours Grok 4 Pro. The context picture favours GPT-5.1 Turbo. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Turbo for quality-sensitive work and Grok 4 Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose GPT-5.1 Turbo if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.

Choose Grok 4 Pro if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.1 Turbo better than Grok 4 Pro?

On the index average, GPT-5.1 Turbo leads Grok 4 Pro by 0.7 points (86.1 versus 85.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-5.1 Turbo wins 6 benchmarks, Grok 4 Pro wins 5.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 Turbo or Grok 4 Pro?

Grok 4 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $33.68 per million tokens, versus $36.85 for GPT-5.1 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.1 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Grok 4 Pro has 1,000,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-5.1 Turbo is proprietary; Grok 4 Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Turbo for quality-sensitive work and Grok 4 Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons