Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-5.1 Turbo vs Grok 4 Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-5.1 Turbo and Grok 4 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 4 Turbo has the stronger average benchmark score; Grok 4 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Turbo

GPT-5.1 Turbo is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.19 per million input tokens and $89.83 per million output tokens, and averages 86.1 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.19 / 1M
Output
$89.83 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.1
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Turbo page
xAI

Grok 4 Turbo

Grok 4 Turbo is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $19.21 per million input tokens and $87.37 per million output tokens, and averages 86.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.21 / 1M
Output
$87.37 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
86.7
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-5.1 TurboGrok 4 TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$19.19$19.21A
Output price / 1M$89.83$87.37B
Context window2,000,0001,000,000A
Max output128,00065,536A
Average score86.186.7B
Arena Elo1482.01466.9A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-5.1 Turbo wins 4, Grok 4 Turbo wins 8, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-5.1 TurboGrok 4 TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro85.286.10.9Grok 4 Turbo
GPQA Diamond81.384.53.2Grok 4 Turbo
SWE-bench Verified74.773.80.9GPT-5.1 Turbo
HumanEval91.592.91.4Grok 4 Turbo
MATH-50091.492.10.7Grok 4 Turbo
AIME 202584.785.20.5Grok 4 Turbo
LiveCodeBench84.684.70.1Grok 4 Turbo
IFEval93.491.12.3GPT-5.1 Turbo
TruthfulQA89.288.80.4GPT-5.1 Turbo
HellaSwag91.392.51.2Grok 4 Turbo
MMMU79.781.72.0Grok 4 Turbo
Arena Elo1482.01466.915.1GPT-5.1 Turbo

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-5.1 Turbo costs about $36.85 per million tokens and Grok 4 Turbo costs about $36.25. Grok 4 Turbo is roughly 2% cheaper than GPT-5.1 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-5.1 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 for Grok 4 Turbo. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Turbo wins 4, Grok 4 Turbo wins 8, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 4 Turbo leads GPT-5.1 Turbo by 0.6 points (86.7 versus 86.1).

The price picture favours Grok 4 Turbo. The context picture favours GPT-5.1 Turbo. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 Turbo for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose GPT-5.1 Turbo if

  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose Grok 4 Turbo if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.1 Turbo better than Grok 4 Turbo?

On the index average, Grok 4 Turbo leads GPT-5.1 Turbo by 0.6 points (86.7 versus 86.1). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-5.1 Turbo wins 4 benchmarks, Grok 4 Turbo wins 8.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 Turbo or Grok 4 Turbo?

Grok 4 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $36.25 per million tokens, versus $36.85 for GPT-5.1 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.1 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Grok 4 Turbo has 1,000,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-5.1 Turbo is proprietary; Grok 4 Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 Turbo for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons