Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-5.1 Turbo vs Qwen3-Max Max: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-5.1 Turbo and Qwen3-Max Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.1 Turbo has the stronger average benchmark score; Qwen3-Max Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Turbo

GPT-5.1 Turbo is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.19 per million input tokens and $89.83 per million output tokens, and averages 86.1 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.19 / 1M
Output
$89.83 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.1
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Turbo page
Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3-Max Max

Qwen3-Max Max is a frontier model from Alibaba Cloud. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $18.53 per million input tokens and $74.05 per million output tokens, and averages 85.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$18.53 / 1M
Output
$74.05 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
85.9
Open weights
No
Full Qwen3-Max Max page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-5.1 TurboQwen3-Max MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$19.19$18.53B
Output price / 1M$89.83$74.05B
Context window2,000,000400,000A
Max output128,00065,536A
Average score86.185.9A
Arena Elo1482.01467.7A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-5.1 Turbo wins 6, Qwen3-Max Max wins 5, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-5.1 TurboQwen3-Max MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro85.285.20.0Tie
GPQA Diamond81.383.82.5Qwen3-Max Max
SWE-bench Verified74.774.30.4GPT-5.1 Turbo
HumanEval91.590.21.3GPT-5.1 Turbo
MATH-50091.492.81.4Qwen3-Max Max
AIME 202584.782.72.0GPT-5.1 Turbo
LiveCodeBench84.682.81.8GPT-5.1 Turbo
IFEval93.493.70.3Qwen3-Max Max
TruthfulQA89.289.30.1Qwen3-Max Max
HellaSwag91.391.40.1Qwen3-Max Max
MMMU79.778.90.8GPT-5.1 Turbo
Arena Elo1482.01467.714.3GPT-5.1 Turbo

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-5.1 Turbo costs about $36.85 per million tokens and Qwen3-Max Max costs about $32.41. Qwen3-Max Max is roughly 12% cheaper than GPT-5.1 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-5.1 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Qwen3-Max Max. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Turbo wins 6, Qwen3-Max Max wins 5, and 1 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.1 Turbo leads Qwen3-Max Max by 0.2 points (86.1 versus 85.9).

The price picture favours Qwen3-Max Max. The context picture favours GPT-5.1 Turbo. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Turbo for quality-sensitive work and Qwen3-Max Max for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose GPT-5.1 Turbo if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose Qwen3-Max Max if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.1 Turbo better than Qwen3-Max Max?

On the index average, GPT-5.1 Turbo leads Qwen3-Max Max by 0.2 points (86.1 versus 85.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-5.1 Turbo wins 6 benchmarks, Qwen3-Max Max wins 5.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 Turbo or Qwen3-Max Max?

Qwen3-Max Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $32.41 per million tokens, versus $36.85 for GPT-5.1 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.1 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Qwen3-Max Max has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-5.1 Turbo is proprietary; Qwen3-Max Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Turbo for quality-sensitive work and Qwen3-Max Max for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons