Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-5.2 Max vs GPT-5.2 Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-5.2 Max and GPT-5.2 Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.2 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-5.2 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Max

GPT-5.2 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $21.39 per million input tokens and $90.69 per million output tokens, and averages 89.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$21.39 / 1M
Output
$90.69 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
89.2
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.2 Max page
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Reasoning

GPT-5.2 Reasoning is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $20.98 per million input tokens and $102.78 per million output tokens, and averages 87.5 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$20.98 / 1M
Output
$102.78 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
87.5
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.2 Reasoning page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-5.2 MaxGPT-5.2 ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$21.39$20.98B
Output price / 1M$90.69$102.78A
Context window1,000,0001,000,000Tie
Max output128,00065,536A
Average score89.287.5A
Arena Elo1495.31500.4B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-5.2 Max wins 9, GPT-5.2 Reasoning wins 3, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 MaxGPT-5.2 ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.687.00.6GPT-5.2 Max
GPQA Diamond83.487.03.6GPT-5.2 Reasoning
SWE-bench Verified80.578.22.3GPT-5.2 Max
HumanEval93.692.41.2GPT-5.2 Max
MATH-50096.791.45.3GPT-5.2 Max
AIME 202588.284.93.3GPT-5.2 Max
LiveCodeBench84.884.60.2GPT-5.2 Max
IFEval95.295.00.2GPT-5.2 Max
TruthfulQA88.188.20.1GPT-5.2 Reasoning
HellaSwag96.192.53.6GPT-5.2 Max
MMMU86.981.55.4GPT-5.2 Max
Arena Elo1495.31500.45.1GPT-5.2 Reasoning

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-5.2 Max costs about $38.72 per million tokens and GPT-5.2 Reasoning costs about $41.43. GPT-5.2 Max is roughly 7% cheaper than GPT-5.2 Reasoning. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 1,000,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.2 Max wins 9, GPT-5.2 Reasoning wins 3, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.2 Max leads GPT-5.2 Reasoning by 1.7 points (89.2 versus 87.5).

The price picture favours GPT-5.2 Max. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.2 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose GPT-5.2 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose GPT-5.2 Reasoning if

  • You prefer OpenAI's tooling or already use it.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.2 Max better than GPT-5.2 Reasoning?

On the index average, GPT-5.2 Max leads GPT-5.2 Reasoning by 1.7 points (89.2 versus 87.5). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-5.2 Max wins 9 benchmarks, GPT-5.2 Reasoning wins 3.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Max or GPT-5.2 Reasoning?

GPT-5.2 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $38.72 per million tokens, versus $41.43 for GPT-5.2 Reasoning.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 1,000,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-5.2 Max is proprietary; GPT-5.2 Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.2 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons