Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

GPT-5.2 Turbo vs Grok 4 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared GPT-5.2 Turbo and Grok 4 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.2 Turbo has the stronger average benchmark score; Grok 4 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Turbo

GPT-5.2 Turbo is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $20.73 per million input tokens and $96.05 per million output tokens, and averages 87.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$20.73 / 1M
Output
$96.05 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
87.4
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.2 Turbo page
xAI

Grok 4 Max

Grok 4 Max is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.70 per million input tokens and $98.29 per million output tokens, and averages 86.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.70 / 1M
Output
$98.29 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.6
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecGPT-5.2 TurboGrok 4 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$20.73$19.70B
Output price / 1M$96.05$98.29A
Context window1,000,0002,000,000B
Max output8,19216,384B
Average score87.486.6A
Arena Elo1500.31491.4A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

GPT-5.2 Turbo wins 7, Grok 4 Max wins 5, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 TurboGrok 4 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.387.80.5Grok 4 Max
GPQA Diamond84.082.02.0GPT-5.2 Turbo
SWE-bench Verified77.474.33.1GPT-5.2 Turbo
HumanEval93.293.40.2Grok 4 Max
MATH-50092.794.61.9Grok 4 Max
AIME 202586.787.30.6Grok 4 Max
LiveCodeBench82.581.31.2GPT-5.2 Turbo
IFEval92.092.50.5Grok 4 Max
TruthfulQA87.385.81.5GPT-5.2 Turbo
HellaSwag95.594.11.4GPT-5.2 Turbo
MMMU83.380.03.3GPT-5.2 Turbo
Arena Elo1500.31491.48.9GPT-5.2 Turbo

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, GPT-5.2 Turbo costs about $39.56 per million tokens and Grok 4 Max costs about $39.35. Grok 4 Max is roughly 1% cheaper than GPT-5.2 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 4 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 for GPT-5.2 Turbo. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.2 Turbo wins 7, Grok 4 Max wins 5, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.2 Turbo leads Grok 4 Max by 0.8 points (87.4 versus 86.6).

The price picture favours Grok 4 Max. The context picture favours Grok 4 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.2 Turbo for quality-sensitive work and Grok 4 Max for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose GPT-5.2 Turbo if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

Choose Grok 4 Max if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 16,384-token output limit.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.2 Turbo better than Grok 4 Max?

On the index average, GPT-5.2 Turbo leads Grok 4 Max by 0.8 points (87.4 versus 86.6). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. GPT-5.2 Turbo wins 7 benchmarks, Grok 4 Max wins 5.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Turbo or Grok 4 Max?

Grok 4 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $39.35 per million tokens, versus $39.56 for GPT-5.2 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. GPT-5.2 Turbo has 1,000,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

GPT-5.2 Turbo is proprietary; Grok 4 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.2 Turbo for quality-sensitive work and Grok 4 Max for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons