Head-to-head · frontier vs multimodal

Grok 3 Reasoning vs Grok 3 Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared Grok 3 Reasoning and Grok 3 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 3 Turbo has the stronger average benchmark score; Grok 3 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

xAI

Grok 3 Reasoning

Grok 3 Reasoning is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $16.07 per million input tokens and $74.65 per million output tokens, and averages 82.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.07 / 1M
Output
$74.65 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
82.9
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Reasoning page
xAI

Grok 3 Turbo

Grok 3 Turbo is a multimodal model from xAI. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $15.97 per million input tokens and $70.13 per million output tokens, and averages 83.1 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$15.97 / 1M
Output
$70.13 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
83.1
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecGrok 3 ReasoningGrok 3 TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$16.07$15.97B
Output price / 1M$74.65$70.13B
Context window200,000128,000A
Max output16,38465,536B
Average score82.983.1B
Arena Elo1448.01438.4A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Grok 3 Reasoning wins 6, Grok 3 Turbo wins 6, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGrok 3 ReasoningGrok 3 TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.583.70.8Grok 3 Reasoning
GPQA Diamond77.379.11.8Grok 3 Turbo
SWE-bench Verified74.071.42.6Grok 3 Reasoning
HumanEval88.586.81.7Grok 3 Reasoning
MATH-50090.285.64.6Grok 3 Reasoning
AIME 202578.283.14.9Grok 3 Turbo
LiveCodeBench76.576.40.1Grok 3 Reasoning
IFEval90.290.70.5Grok 3 Turbo
TruthfulQA83.486.02.6Grok 3 Turbo
HellaSwag89.790.20.5Grok 3 Turbo
MMMU79.481.31.9Grok 3 Turbo
Arena Elo1448.01438.49.6Grok 3 Reasoning

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Grok 3 Reasoning costs about $30.72 per million tokens and Grok 3 Turbo costs about $29.51. Grok 3 Turbo is roughly 4% cheaper than Grok 3 Reasoning. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 3 Reasoning has the larger context window at 200,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for Grok 3 Turbo. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 6, Grok 3 Turbo wins 6, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 3 Turbo leads Grok 3 Reasoning by 0.2 points (83.1 versus 82.9).

The price picture favours Grok 3 Turbo. The context picture favours Grok 3 Reasoning. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Turbo for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Grok 3 Reasoning if

  • You need the larger 200,000-token context window.

Choose Grok 3 Turbo if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Grok 3 Reasoning better than Grok 3 Turbo?

On the index average, Grok 3 Turbo leads Grok 3 Reasoning by 0.2 points (83.1 versus 82.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Grok 3 Reasoning wins 6 benchmarks, Grok 3 Turbo wins 6.

Which is cheaper, Grok 3 Reasoning or Grok 3 Turbo?

Grok 3 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $29.51 per million tokens, versus $30.72 for Grok 3 Reasoning.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 3 Reasoning has the larger context window at 200,000 tokens. Grok 3 Turbo has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Grok 3 Reasoning is proprietary; Grok 3 Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Turbo for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons