Head-to-head · multimodal vs frontier

Grok 3 vs Grok 3 Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared Grok 3 and Grok 3 Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 3 Reasoning has the stronger average benchmark score; Grok 3 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

xAI

Grok 3

Grok 3 is a multimodal model from xAI. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $15.84 per million input tokens and $70.31 per million output tokens, and averages 82.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$15.84 / 1M
Output
$70.31 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
82.8
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 page
xAI

Grok 3 Reasoning

Grok 3 Reasoning is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $16.07 per million input tokens and $74.65 per million output tokens, and averages 82.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.07 / 1M
Output
$74.65 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
82.9
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Reasoning page

Specification comparison

SpecGrok 3Grok 3 ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$15.84$16.07A
Output price / 1M$70.31$74.65A
Context window128,000200,000B
Max output4,09616,384B
Average score82.882.9B
Arena Elo1447.21448.0B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Grok 3 wins 5, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGrok 3Grok 3 ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro81.984.52.6Grok 3 Reasoning
GPQA Diamond80.077.32.7Grok 3
SWE-bench Verified72.674.01.4Grok 3 Reasoning
HumanEval85.388.53.2Grok 3 Reasoning
MATH-50088.790.21.5Grok 3 Reasoning
AIME 202581.178.22.9Grok 3
LiveCodeBench74.376.52.2Grok 3 Reasoning
IFEval91.090.20.8Grok 3
TruthfulQA85.483.42.0Grok 3
HellaSwag91.489.71.7Grok 3
MMMU79.179.40.3Grok 3 Reasoning
Arena Elo1447.21448.00.8Grok 3 Reasoning

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Grok 3 costs about $29.46 per million tokens and Grok 3 Reasoning costs about $30.72. Grok 3 is roughly 4% cheaper than Grok 3 Reasoning. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 3 Reasoning has the larger context window at 200,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for Grok 3. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Grok 3 wins 5, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 3 Reasoning leads Grok 3 by 0.1 points (82.9 versus 82.8).

The price picture favours Grok 3. The context picture favours Grok 3 Reasoning. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work and Grok 3 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Grok 3 if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose Grok 3 Reasoning if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 200,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 16,384-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Grok 3 better than Grok 3 Reasoning?

On the index average, Grok 3 Reasoning leads Grok 3 by 0.1 points (82.9 versus 82.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Grok 3 wins 5 benchmarks, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 7.

Which is cheaper, Grok 3 or Grok 3 Reasoning?

Grok 3 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $29.46 per million tokens, versus $30.72 for Grok 3 Reasoning.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 3 Reasoning has the larger context window at 200,000 tokens. Grok 3 has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Grok 3 is proprietary; Grok 3 Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work and Grok 3 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons