Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Grok 4 Pro vs o3 Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared Grok 4 Pro and o3 Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 4 Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; o3 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

xAI

Grok 4 Pro

Grok 4 Pro is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $19.00 per million input tokens and $77.72 per million output tokens, and averages 85.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.00 / 1M
Output
$77.72 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
85.4
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 Pro page
OpenAI

o3 Reasoning

o3 Reasoning is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $18.07 per million input tokens and $70.65 per million output tokens, and averages 85.3 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$18.07 / 1M
Output
$70.65 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
85.3
Open weights
No
Full o3 Reasoning page

Specification comparison

SpecGrok 4 Proo3 ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$19.00$18.07B
Output price / 1M$77.72$70.65B
Context window1,000,000200,000A
Max output128,00016,384A
Average score85.485.3A
Arena Elo1487.51456.9A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Grok 4 Pro wins 7, o3 Reasoning wins 5, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGrok 4 Proo3 ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.987.72.8o3 Reasoning
GPQA Diamond79.279.60.4o3 Reasoning
SWE-bench Verified74.774.10.6Grok 4 Pro
HumanEval89.791.31.6o3 Reasoning
MATH-50092.392.00.3Grok 4 Pro
AIME 202585.480.54.9Grok 4 Pro
LiveCodeBench77.882.74.9o3 Reasoning
IFEval91.390.60.7Grok 4 Pro
TruthfulQA86.086.50.5o3 Reasoning
HellaSwag92.890.91.9Grok 4 Pro
MMMU84.982.32.6Grok 4 Pro
Arena Elo1487.51456.930.6Grok 4 Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Grok 4 Pro costs about $33.68 per million tokens and o3 Reasoning costs about $31.22. o3 Reasoning is roughly 7% cheaper than Grok 4 Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 4 Pro has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for o3 Reasoning. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Grok 4 Pro wins 7, o3 Reasoning wins 5, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 4 Pro leads o3 Reasoning by 0.1 points (85.4 versus 85.3).

The price picture favours o3 Reasoning. The context picture favours Grok 4 Pro. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 Pro for quality-sensitive work and o3 Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Grok 4 Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose o3 Reasoning if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is Grok 4 Pro better than o3 Reasoning?

On the index average, Grok 4 Pro leads o3 Reasoning by 0.1 points (85.4 versus 85.3). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Grok 4 Pro wins 7 benchmarks, o3 Reasoning wins 5.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4 Pro or o3 Reasoning?

o3 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $31.22 per million tokens, versus $33.68 for Grok 4 Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4 Pro has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. o3 Reasoning has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Grok 4 Pro is proprietary; o3 Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 Pro for quality-sensitive work and o3 Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons