Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Grok 4 Pro vs Qwen3-Max Max: which model should you choose?

We compared Grok 4 Pro and Qwen3-Max Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Qwen3-Max Max has the stronger average benchmark score; Qwen3-Max Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

xAI

Grok 4 Pro

Grok 4 Pro is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $19.00 per million input tokens and $77.72 per million output tokens, and averages 85.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.00 / 1M
Output
$77.72 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
85.4
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 Pro page
Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3-Max Max

Qwen3-Max Max is a frontier model from Alibaba Cloud. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $18.53 per million input tokens and $74.05 per million output tokens, and averages 85.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$18.53 / 1M
Output
$74.05 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
85.9
Open weights
No
Full Qwen3-Max Max page

Specification comparison

SpecGrok 4 ProQwen3-Max MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$19.00$18.53B
Output price / 1M$77.72$74.05B
Context window1,000,000400,000A
Max output128,00065,536A
Average score85.485.9B
Arena Elo1487.51467.7A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Grok 4 Pro wins 5, Qwen3-Max Max wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGrok 4 ProQwen3-Max MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.985.20.3Qwen3-Max Max
GPQA Diamond79.283.84.6Qwen3-Max Max
SWE-bench Verified74.774.30.4Grok 4 Pro
HumanEval89.790.20.5Qwen3-Max Max
MATH-50092.392.80.5Qwen3-Max Max
AIME 202585.482.72.7Grok 4 Pro
LiveCodeBench77.882.85.0Qwen3-Max Max
IFEval91.393.72.4Qwen3-Max Max
TruthfulQA86.089.33.3Qwen3-Max Max
HellaSwag92.891.41.4Grok 4 Pro
MMMU84.978.96.0Grok 4 Pro
Arena Elo1487.51467.719.8Grok 4 Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Grok 4 Pro costs about $33.68 per million tokens and Qwen3-Max Max costs about $32.41. Qwen3-Max Max is roughly 4% cheaper than Grok 4 Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 4 Pro has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Qwen3-Max Max. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Grok 4 Pro wins 5, Qwen3-Max Max wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Qwen3-Max Max leads Grok 4 Pro by 0.5 points (85.9 versus 85.4).

The price picture favours Qwen3-Max Max. The context picture favours Grok 4 Pro. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Qwen3-Max Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Grok 4 Pro if

  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose Qwen3-Max Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is Grok 4 Pro better than Qwen3-Max Max?

On the index average, Qwen3-Max Max leads Grok 4 Pro by 0.5 points (85.9 versus 85.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Grok 4 Pro wins 5 benchmarks, Qwen3-Max Max wins 7.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4 Pro or Qwen3-Max Max?

Qwen3-Max Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $32.41 per million tokens, versus $33.68 for Grok 4 Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4 Pro has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3-Max Max has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Grok 4 Pro is proprietary; Qwen3-Max Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Qwen3-Max Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons