Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Grok 4 Pro vs Qwen3-Max Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared Grok 4 Pro and Qwen3-Max Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Qwen3-Max Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; Grok 4 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

xAI

Grok 4 Pro

Grok 4 Pro is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $19.00 per million input tokens and $77.72 per million output tokens, and averages 85.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.00 / 1M
Output
$77.72 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
85.4
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 Pro page
Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3-Max Pro

Qwen3-Max Pro is a frontier model from Alibaba Cloud. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $18.87 per million input tokens and $84.39 per million output tokens, and averages 86.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$18.87 / 1M
Output
$84.39 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
86.2
Open weights
No
Full Qwen3-Max Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecGrok 4 ProQwen3-Max ProEdge
Input price / 1M$19.00$18.87B
Output price / 1M$77.72$84.39A
Context window1,000,000400,000A
Max output128,0008,192A
Average score85.486.2B
Arena Elo1487.51466.4A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Grok 4 Pro wins 4, Qwen3-Max Pro wins 7, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGrok 4 ProQwen3-Max ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.988.73.8Qwen3-Max Pro
GPQA Diamond79.280.00.8Qwen3-Max Pro
SWE-bench Verified74.775.60.9Qwen3-Max Pro
HumanEval89.792.12.4Qwen3-Max Pro
MATH-50092.391.80.5Grok 4 Pro
AIME 202585.485.40.0Tie
LiveCodeBench77.881.03.2Qwen3-Max Pro
IFEval91.393.21.9Qwen3-Max Pro
TruthfulQA86.088.62.6Qwen3-Max Pro
HellaSwag92.892.40.4Grok 4 Pro
MMMU84.979.55.4Grok 4 Pro
Arena Elo1487.51466.421.1Grok 4 Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Grok 4 Pro costs about $33.68 per million tokens and Qwen3-Max Pro costs about $35.25. Grok 4 Pro is roughly 4% cheaper than Qwen3-Max Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 4 Pro has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Qwen3-Max Pro. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Grok 4 Pro wins 4, Qwen3-Max Pro wins 7, and 1 are tied. On the index average, Qwen3-Max Pro leads Grok 4 Pro by 0.8 points (86.2 versus 85.4).

The price picture favours Grok 4 Pro. The context picture favours Grok 4 Pro. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Qwen3-Max Pro for quality-sensitive work and Grok 4 Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Grok 4 Pro if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose Qwen3-Max Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

FAQ

Is Grok 4 Pro better than Qwen3-Max Pro?

On the index average, Qwen3-Max Pro leads Grok 4 Pro by 0.8 points (86.2 versus 85.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Grok 4 Pro wins 4 benchmarks, Qwen3-Max Pro wins 7.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4 Pro or Qwen3-Max Pro?

Grok 4 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $33.68 per million tokens, versus $35.25 for Qwen3-Max Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4 Pro has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3-Max Pro has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Grok 4 Pro is proprietary; Qwen3-Max Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Qwen3-Max Pro for quality-sensitive work and Grok 4 Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons