Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Grok 4 vs Qwen3-Max Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared Grok 4 and Qwen3-Max Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 4 has the stronger average benchmark score; Qwen3-Max Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

xAI

Grok 4

Grok 4 is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $17.90 per million input tokens and $84.75 per million output tokens, and averages 86.5 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.90 / 1M
Output
$84.75 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
86.5
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 page
Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3-Max Reasoning

Qwen3-Max Reasoning is a frontier model from Alibaba Cloud. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $18.12 per million input tokens and $81.94 per million output tokens, and averages 85.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$18.12 / 1M
Output
$81.94 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
85.9
Open weights
No
Full Qwen3-Max Reasoning page

Specification comparison

SpecGrok 4Qwen3-Max ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$17.90$18.12A
Output price / 1M$84.75$81.94B
Context window200,0002,000,000B
Max output32,7688,192A
Average score86.585.9A
Arena Elo1457.81461.0B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Grok 4 wins 5, Qwen3-Max Reasoning wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3-Max ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.888.10.3Qwen3-Max Reasoning
GPQA Diamond82.679.82.8Grok 4
SWE-bench Verified77.975.32.6Grok 4
HumanEval92.092.60.6Qwen3-Max Reasoning
MATH-50090.893.02.2Qwen3-Max Reasoning
AIME 202582.283.10.9Qwen3-Max Reasoning
LiveCodeBench82.278.04.2Grok 4
IFEval91.692.20.6Qwen3-Max Reasoning
TruthfulQA87.688.81.2Qwen3-Max Reasoning
HellaSwag93.991.52.4Grok 4
MMMU82.982.30.6Grok 4
Arena Elo1457.81461.03.2Qwen3-Max Reasoning

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Grok 4 costs about $34.61 per million tokens and Qwen3-Max Reasoning costs about $34.08. Qwen3-Max Reasoning is roughly 2% cheaper than Grok 4. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Qwen3-Max Reasoning has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for Grok 4. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Grok 4 wins 5, Qwen3-Max Reasoning wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 4 leads Qwen3-Max Reasoning by 0.6 points (86.5 versus 85.9).

The price picture favours Qwen3-Max Reasoning. The context picture favours Qwen3-Max Reasoning. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 for quality-sensitive work and Qwen3-Max Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Grok 4 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 32,768-token output limit.

Choose Qwen3-Max Reasoning if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is Grok 4 better than Qwen3-Max Reasoning?

On the index average, Grok 4 leads Qwen3-Max Reasoning by 0.6 points (86.5 versus 85.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Grok 4 wins 5 benchmarks, Qwen3-Max Reasoning wins 7.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4 or Qwen3-Max Reasoning?

Qwen3-Max Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $34.08 per million tokens, versus $34.61 for Grok 4.

Which has the larger context window?

Qwen3-Max Reasoning has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Grok 4 has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Grok 4 is proprietary; Qwen3-Max Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 for quality-sensitive work and Qwen3-Max Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons