Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Grok 4 vs Qwen3-Max Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared Grok 4 and Qwen3-Max Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 4 has the stronger average benchmark score; Qwen3-Max Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

xAI

Grok 4

Grok 4 is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $17.90 per million input tokens and $84.75 per million output tokens, and averages 86.5 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.90 / 1M
Output
$84.75 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
86.5
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 page
Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3-Max Turbo

Qwen3-Max Turbo is a frontier model from Alibaba Cloud. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $17.70 per million input tokens and $63.95 per million output tokens, and averages 84.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.70 / 1M
Output
$63.95 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
84.7
Open weights
No
Full Qwen3-Max Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecGrok 4Qwen3-Max TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$17.90$17.70B
Output price / 1M$84.75$63.95B
Context window200,0001,000,000B
Max output32,768128,000B
Average score86.584.7A
Arena Elo1457.81456.9A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Grok 4 wins 9, Qwen3-Max Turbo wins 3, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3-Max TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.886.81.0Grok 4
GPQA Diamond82.678.34.3Grok 4
SWE-bench Verified77.975.92.0Grok 4
HumanEval92.092.50.5Qwen3-Max Turbo
MATH-50090.891.91.1Qwen3-Max Turbo
AIME 202582.281.21.0Grok 4
LiveCodeBench82.276.85.4Grok 4
IFEval91.692.10.5Qwen3-Max Turbo
TruthfulQA87.686.31.3Grok 4
HellaSwag93.990.83.1Grok 4
MMMU82.978.84.1Grok 4
Arena Elo1457.81456.90.9Grok 4

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Grok 4 costs about $34.61 per million tokens and Qwen3-Max Turbo costs about $29.26. Qwen3-Max Turbo is roughly 15% cheaper than Grok 4. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Qwen3-Max Turbo has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for Grok 4. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Grok 4 wins 9, Qwen3-Max Turbo wins 3, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 4 leads Qwen3-Max Turbo by 1.8 points (86.5 versus 84.7).

The price picture favours Qwen3-Max Turbo. The context picture favours Qwen3-Max Turbo. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 for quality-sensitive work and Qwen3-Max Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Grok 4 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

Choose Qwen3-Max Turbo if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Grok 4 better than Qwen3-Max Turbo?

On the index average, Grok 4 leads Qwen3-Max Turbo by 1.8 points (86.5 versus 84.7). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Grok 4 wins 9 benchmarks, Qwen3-Max Turbo wins 3.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4 or Qwen3-Max Turbo?

Qwen3-Max Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $29.26 per million tokens, versus $34.61 for Grok 4.

Which has the larger context window?

Qwen3-Max Turbo has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 4 has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Grok 4 is proprietary; Qwen3-Max Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 for quality-sensitive work and Qwen3-Max Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons