Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

Kimi K1.5 Instruct vs MiniMax-M2: which model should you choose?

We compared Kimi K1.5 Instruct and MiniMax-M2 on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. MiniMax-M2 has the stronger average benchmark score; MiniMax-M2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Moonshot AI

Kimi K1.5 Instruct

Kimi K1.5 Instruct is a multimodal model from Moonshot AI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $5.15 per million input tokens and $28.20 per million output tokens, and averages 80.5 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.15 / 1M
Output
$28.20 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
80.5
Open weights
Yes
Full Kimi K1.5 Instruct page
MiniMax

MiniMax-M2

MiniMax-M2 is a multimodal model from MiniMax. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $5.19 per million input tokens and $22.73 per million output tokens, and averages 80.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.19 / 1M
Output
$22.73 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
80.6
Open weights
Yes
Full MiniMax-M2 page

Specification comparison

SpecKimi K1.5 InstructMiniMax-M2Edge
Input price / 1M$5.15$5.19A
Output price / 1M$28.20$22.73B
Context window200,000200,000Tie
Max output4,09665,536B
Average score80.580.6B
Arena Elo1431.81423.8A
Open weightsYesYesTie

Benchmark comparison

Kimi K1.5 Instruct wins 8, MiniMax-M2 wins 4, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkKimi K1.5 InstructMiniMax-M2GapWinner
MMLU-Pro83.081.81.2Kimi K1.5 Instruct
GPQA Diamond77.475.42.0Kimi K1.5 Instruct
SWE-bench Verified67.869.92.1MiniMax-M2
HumanEval84.088.04.0MiniMax-M2
MATH-50082.682.30.3Kimi K1.5 Instruct
AIME 202580.478.12.3Kimi K1.5 Instruct
LiveCodeBench71.173.42.3MiniMax-M2
IFEval86.286.10.1Kimi K1.5 Instruct
TruthfulQA84.383.50.8Kimi K1.5 Instruct
HellaSwag90.290.40.2MiniMax-M2
MMMU78.678.00.6Kimi K1.5 Instruct
Arena Elo1431.81423.88.0Kimi K1.5 Instruct

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Kimi K1.5 Instruct costs about $10.91 per million tokens and MiniMax-M2 costs about $9.57. MiniMax-M2 is roughly 12% cheaper than Kimi K1.5 Instruct. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 200,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Kimi K1.5 Instruct wins 8, MiniMax-M2 wins 4, and 0 are tied. On the index average, MiniMax-M2 leads Kimi K1.5 Instruct by 0.1 points (80.6 versus 80.5).

The price picture favours MiniMax-M2. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with MiniMax-M2 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Kimi K1.5 Instruct if

  • You prefer Moonshot AI's tooling or already use it.

Choose MiniMax-M2 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Kimi K1.5 Instruct better than MiniMax-M2?

On the index average, MiniMax-M2 leads Kimi K1.5 Instruct by 0.1 points (80.6 versus 80.5). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Kimi K1.5 Instruct wins 8 benchmarks, MiniMax-M2 wins 4.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K1.5 Instruct or MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $9.57 per million tokens, versus $10.91 for Kimi K1.5 Instruct.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 200,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Kimi K1.5 Instruct is open weights; MiniMax-M2 is open weights.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with MiniMax-M2 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons