Llama 4 Maverick Chat vs Qwen3 Instruct: which model should you choose?
We compared Llama 4 Maverick Chat and Qwen3 Instruct on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Qwen3 Instruct has the stronger average benchmark score; Llama 4 Maverick Chat is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.
Llama 4 Maverick Chat
Llama 4 Maverick Chat is a multimodal model from Meta AI. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $5.09 per million input tokens and $23.20 per million output tokens, and averages 79.7 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $5.09 / 1M
- Output
- $23.20 / 1M
- Context
- 128,000
- Avg score
- 79.7
- Open weights
- Yes
Qwen3 Instruct
Qwen3 Instruct is a multimodal model from Alibaba Cloud. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $5.06 per million input tokens and $25.39 per million output tokens, and averages 79.8 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $5.06 / 1M
- Output
- $25.39 / 1M
- Context
- 1,000,000
- Avg score
- 79.8
- Open weights
- Yes
Specification comparison
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick Chat | Qwen3 Instruct | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $5.09 | $5.06 | B |
| Output price / 1M | $23.20 | $25.39 | A |
| Context window | 128,000 | 1,000,000 | B |
| Max output | 32,768 | 128,000 | B |
| Average score | 79.7 | 79.8 | B |
| Arena Elo | 1419.9 | 1419.2 | A |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | Tie |
Benchmark comparison
Llama 4 Maverick Chat wins 6, Qwen3 Instruct wins 6, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick Chat | Qwen3 Instruct | Gap | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5 | 80.3 | 0.2 | Llama 4 Maverick Chat |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.0 | 74.1 | 1.1 | Qwen3 Instruct |
| SWE-bench Verified | 66.6 | 68.5 | 1.9 | Qwen3 Instruct |
| HumanEval | 83.2 | 85.1 | 1.9 | Qwen3 Instruct |
| MATH-500 | 84.8 | 86.1 | 1.3 | Qwen3 Instruct |
| AIME 2025 | 78.9 | 78.5 | 0.4 | Llama 4 Maverick Chat |
| LiveCodeBench | 76.3 | 71.1 | 5.2 | Llama 4 Maverick Chat |
| IFEval | 87.4 | 89.1 | 1.7 | Qwen3 Instruct |
| TruthfulQA | 81.5 | 79.7 | 1.8 | Llama 4 Maverick Chat |
| HellaSwag | 88.8 | 87.0 | 1.8 | Llama 4 Maverick Chat |
| MMMU | 75.4 | 78.7 | 3.3 | Qwen3 Instruct |
| Arena Elo | 1419.9 | 1419.2 | 0.7 | Llama 4 Maverick Chat |
Price analysis
On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Llama 4 Maverick Chat costs about $9.62 per million tokens and Qwen3 Instruct costs about $10.14. Llama 4 Maverick Chat is roughly 5% cheaper than Qwen3 Instruct. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.
Qwen3 Instruct has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for Llama 4 Maverick Chat. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.
Verdict
Across 12 shared benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick Chat wins 6, Qwen3 Instruct wins 6, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Qwen3 Instruct leads Llama 4 Maverick Chat by 0.1 points (79.8 versus 79.7).
The price picture favours Llama 4 Maverick Chat. The context picture favours Qwen3 Instruct. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.
If you need a single default, start with Qwen3 Instruct for quality-sensitive work and Llama 4 Maverick Chat for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.
Choose Llama 4 Maverick Chat if
- Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
Choose Qwen3 Instruct if
- You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
- You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
- You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.
FAQ
Is Llama 4 Maverick Chat better than Qwen3 Instruct?
On the index average, Qwen3 Instruct leads Llama 4 Maverick Chat by 0.1 points (79.8 versus 79.7). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Llama 4 Maverick Chat wins 6 benchmarks, Qwen3 Instruct wins 6.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick Chat or Qwen3 Instruct?
Llama 4 Maverick Chat is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $9.62 per million tokens, versus $10.14 for Qwen3 Instruct.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen3 Instruct has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick Chat has 128,000 tokens.
Are these models open weights?
Llama 4 Maverick Chat is open weights; Qwen3 Instruct is open weights.
Which should I choose for production?
If you need a single default, start with Qwen3 Instruct for quality-sensitive work and Llama 4 Maverick Chat for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.