Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

o3 Max vs Qwen3-Max Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared o3 Max and Qwen3-Max Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. o3 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; Qwen3-Max Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

o3 Max

o3 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $17.82 per million input tokens and $90.55 per million output tokens, and averages 84.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.82 / 1M
Output
$90.55 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
84.8
Open weights
No
Full o3 Max page
Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3-Max Turbo

Qwen3-Max Turbo is a frontier model from Alibaba Cloud. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $17.70 per million input tokens and $63.95 per million output tokens, and averages 84.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.70 / 1M
Output
$63.95 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
84.7
Open weights
No
Full Qwen3-Max Turbo page

Specification comparison

Speco3 MaxQwen3-Max TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$17.82$17.70B
Output price / 1M$90.55$63.95B
Context window2,000,0001,000,000A
Max output128,000128,000Tie
Average score84.884.7A
Arena Elo1465.21456.9A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

o3 Max wins 7, Qwen3-Max Turbo wins 5, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

Benchmarko3 MaxQwen3-Max TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.986.81.9Qwen3-Max Turbo
GPQA Diamond82.778.34.4o3 Max
SWE-bench Verified71.875.94.1Qwen3-Max Turbo
HumanEval89.892.52.7Qwen3-Max Turbo
MATH-50087.091.94.9Qwen3-Max Turbo
AIME 202586.281.25.0o3 Max
LiveCodeBench76.476.80.4Qwen3-Max Turbo
IFEval92.592.10.4o3 Max
TruthfulQA87.386.31.0o3 Max
HellaSwag93.490.82.6o3 Max
MMMU80.878.82.0o3 Max
Arena Elo1465.21456.98.3o3 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, o3 Max costs about $36.00 per million tokens and Qwen3-Max Turbo costs about $29.26. Qwen3-Max Turbo is roughly 19% cheaper than o3 Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

o3 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 for Qwen3-Max Turbo. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, o3 Max wins 7, Qwen3-Max Turbo wins 5, and 0 are tied. On the index average, o3 Max leads Qwen3-Max Turbo by 0.1 points (84.8 versus 84.7).

The price picture favours Qwen3-Max Turbo. The context picture favours o3 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with o3 Max for quality-sensitive work and Qwen3-Max Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose o3 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.

Choose Qwen3-Max Turbo if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is o3 Max better than Qwen3-Max Turbo?

On the index average, o3 Max leads Qwen3-Max Turbo by 0.1 points (84.8 versus 84.7). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. o3 Max wins 7 benchmarks, Qwen3-Max Turbo wins 5.

Which is cheaper, o3 Max or Qwen3-Max Turbo?

Qwen3-Max Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $29.26 per million tokens, versus $36.00 for o3 Max.

Which has the larger context window?

o3 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Qwen3-Max Turbo has 1,000,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

o3 Max is proprietary; Qwen3-Max Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with o3 Max for quality-sensitive work and Qwen3-Max Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons