Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

o4 Max vs o4 Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared o4 Max and o4 Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. o4 Reasoning has the stronger average benchmark score; o4 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

OpenAI

o4 Max

o4 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.51 per million input tokens and $93.98 per million output tokens, and averages 86.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.51 / 1M
Output
$93.98 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.2
Open weights
No
Full o4 Max page
OpenAI

o4 Reasoning

o4 Reasoning is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $19.69 per million input tokens and $103.53 per million output tokens, and averages 87.5 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.69 / 1M
Output
$103.53 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
87.5
Open weights
No
Full o4 Reasoning page

Specification comparison

Speco4 Maxo4 ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$19.51$19.69A
Output price / 1M$93.98$103.53A
Context window2,000,0001,000,000A
Max output65,536128,000B
Average score86.287.5B
Arena Elo1486.01472.2A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

o4 Max wins 5, o4 Reasoning wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

Benchmarko4 Maxo4 ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro86.386.10.2o4 Max
GPQA Diamond80.184.03.9o4 Reasoning
SWE-bench Verified79.876.43.4o4 Max
HumanEval94.690.24.4o4 Max
MATH-50090.694.84.2o4 Reasoning
AIME 202584.890.35.5o4 Reasoning
LiveCodeBench80.683.42.8o4 Reasoning
IFEval91.194.53.4o4 Reasoning
TruthfulQA87.189.01.9o4 Reasoning
HellaSwag91.792.40.7o4 Reasoning
MMMU81.981.80.1o4 Max
Arena Elo1486.01472.213.8o4 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, o4 Max costs about $38.13 per million tokens and o4 Reasoning costs about $40.65. o4 Max is roughly 6% cheaper than o4 Reasoning. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

o4 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 for o4 Reasoning. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, o4 Max wins 5, o4 Reasoning wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, o4 Reasoning leads o4 Max by 1.3 points (87.5 versus 86.2).

The price picture favours o4 Max. The context picture favours o4 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with o4 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work and o4 Max for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose o4 Max if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.

Choose o4 Reasoning if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

FAQ

Is o4 Max better than o4 Reasoning?

On the index average, o4 Reasoning leads o4 Max by 1.3 points (87.5 versus 86.2). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. o4 Max wins 5 benchmarks, o4 Reasoning wins 7.

Which is cheaper, o4 Max or o4 Reasoning?

o4 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $38.13 per million tokens, versus $40.65 for o4 Reasoning.

Which has the larger context window?

o4 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. o4 Reasoning has 1,000,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

o4 Max is proprietary; o4 Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with o4 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work and o4 Max for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons