Models · model

How to use Llama 4 Maverick in production

A practical guide to llama-4-maverick, using data from the AI & LLM Index. The goal is a shortlist and a decision, not a tour of every option.

What Llama 4 Maverick is

Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal model from Meta AI, released in 2026-08-28. Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal model from Meta AI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $5.36 per million input tokens and $25.19 per million output tokens, and averages 81.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

It is an open-weight model under a open weights licence. That determines whether you can self-host it, fine-tune it and keep data inside your own infrastructure.

Pricing and context

Llama 4 Maverick costs $5.36 per million input tokens, $25.19 per million output tokens and $0.69 per million cached input tokens. The blended 3:1 figure is about $10.32 per million tokens.

The context window is 200,000 tokens and the maximum output is 8,192 tokens. If your prompts regularly exceed the context window, you need chunking or retrieval before price becomes the main issue.

Benchmark position

Llama 4 Maverick averages 81.6 across the index's scored benchmarks, ranking #94 of 600. Its strongest relative result is Arena Elo.

Use the table below to see the full benchmark profile. A single strong score is less useful than a consistent profile across the benchmarks that resemble your task.

Alternatives

The closest models by average score are Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Doubao 1.5 Pro Reasoning. Compare their prices before assuming the closest score is the best substitute; a small quality drop can cut unit cost substantially.

Llama 4 Maverick benchmark profile

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentile
MMLU-Pro84.7#6789th
GPQA Diamond76.8#10782th
SWE-bench Verified71.8#7787th
HumanEval87.3#8386th
MATH-50082.7#15175th
AIME 202579.6#9484th
LiveCodeBench75.7#8786th
IFEval87.5#11781th

Related

FAQ

Is Llama 4 Maverick worth it?

Llama 4 Maverick averages 81.6 and costs $5.36 per million input tokens. Whether it is worth it depends on whether your task benefits from its benchmark profile; test it against a cheaper alternative.

What is the most important factor in llama-4-maverick?

Fit to the task beats raw benchmark rank. Define the failure modes, pick the benchmarks that resemble them, then test a small shortlist on your own examples.

How many models should I evaluate?

Three is usually enough: a quality candidate, a value candidate and a fallback. More candidates add work without changing the decision.

How do I control cost?

Compare blended 3:1 price, watch output tokens, use caching where available and route simple requests to a cheaper model.