Knowledge · Snowflake

Arctic Base on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

Arctic Base scores 69.5 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #401 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
69.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#401
of 600
Percentile
33th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
22.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Arctic Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, Arctic Base sits at #401 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 22.1 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Arctic Base below the midpoint.

Snowflake models average 65.2 on this benchmark. Arctic Base is 4.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Snowflake model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 72.1. Arctic Base is 2.6 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 69.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.27 per million input tokens, Arctic Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Command A Nano Cohere 8192 $5.90 66.3
OLMo 2 Base Allen Institute for AI 65536 $2.39 67.4
ERNIE 4.5 Nano Baidu 32768 $6.01 65.6
Llama 4 Maverick 8B Meta AI 4096 $1.64 63.4
Arctic Base Snowflake 32768 $2.27 67.5
DeepSeek-R1 7B DeepSeek 32768 $1.79 63.0
Firefunction Mini Fireworks AI 32768 $4.63 63.2

Other benchmarks for Arctic Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 62.0 391 35th
SWE-bench Verified 56.2 374 38th
HumanEval 71.5 383 36th
MATH-500 71.6 370 38th
AIME 2025 62.7 368 39th
LiveCodeBench 61.0 360 40th
IFEval 74.9 399 34th
TruthfulQA 71.9 381 37th
HellaSwag 79.9 379 37th
MMMU 61.6 413 31th
Arena Elo 1343.8 373 38th

FAQ

What score does Arctic Base get on MMLU-Pro?

Arctic Base scores 69.5 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does Arctic Base rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #401 of 600 models, in the 33rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is Arctic Base good at MMLU-Pro?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Arctic Base cost?

Arctic Base costs $2.27 per million input tokens and $10.68 per million output tokens.

Related