Mathematics · Snowflake

Arctic Chat on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Arctic Chat scores 66.0 on AIME 2025, placing it #330 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
66.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#330
of 600
Percentile
45th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
25.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Arctic Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Arctic Chat sits at #330 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 25.4 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Arctic Chat below the midpoint.

Snowflake models average 52.6 on this benchmark. Arctic Chat is 13.4 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Snowflake model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 61.8. Arctic Chat is 4.2 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 66.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.70 per million input tokens, Arctic Chat is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
QwQ Base Alibaba Cloud 65536 $3.68 74.1
Yi-Large 01.AI 32768 $3.40 73.5
GPT-5.1 Nano OpenAI 32768 $9.56 74.1
Llama 3 Replicate Instruct Replicate 128000 $3.71 75.1
Arctic Chat Snowflake 16384 $2.70 69.8
Grok 4 Nano xAI 16384 $8.97 72.7
Fusion OpenRouter 16384 $8.41 71.1

Other benchmarks for Arctic Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 73.6 361 40th
GPQA Diamond 65.6 349 42th
SWE-bench Verified 57.6 361 40th
HumanEval 75.0 344 43th
MATH-500 71.4 374 38th
LiveCodeBench 61.6 355 41th
IFEval 77.6 370 38th
TruthfulQA 73.9 355 41th
HellaSwag 79.7 383 36th
MMMU 66.1 369 39th
Arena Elo 1342.4 377 37th

FAQ

What score does Arctic Chat get on AIME 2025?

Arctic Chat scores 66.0 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Arctic Chat rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #330 of 600 models, in the 45th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Arctic Chat good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Arctic Chat cost?

Arctic Chat costs $2.70 per million input tokens and $11.83 per million output tokens.

Related