Preference · Snowflake

Arctic Chat on Arena Elo: score, rank and what it means

Arctic Chat scores 1342.4 on Arena Elo, placing it #377 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Score
1342.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#377
of 600
Percentile
37th
within the index
Benchmark avg
1349.9
all models
Leader
1501.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max
Gap to leader
159.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on Arena Elo, with Arctic Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Max 1501.9
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 1500.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 1500.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 1497.5
GPT-5.2 Max 1495.3
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 1494.9
Grok 4 Max 1491.4
Claude Opus 4.5 1491.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 1490.0
Grok 4 Reasoning 1487.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
2 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
3 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
6 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
7 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
10 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8

What this score means

On Arena Elo, Arctic Chat sits at #377 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Max, scores 1501.9, so the gap to the top is 159.5 points. The median model in this index scores 1373.8, which puts Arctic Chat below the midpoint.

Snowflake models average 1276.7 on this benchmark. Arctic Chat is 65.7 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Snowflake model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 1338.0. Arctic Chat is 4.4 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 1342.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.70 per million input tokens, Arctic Chat is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on Arena Elo. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Arctic Base Snowflake 32768 $2.27 67.5
Hunyuan-Turbo Mini Tencent 8192 $6.59 68.3
Arctic Instruct Snowflake 65536 $2.83 70.6
Nova Pro Mini Amazon 16384 $7.74 70.6
Arctic Chat Snowflake 16384 $2.70 69.8
Auto OpenRouter 32768 $7.53 70.2
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano Anthropic 65536 $6.93 68.9

Other benchmarks for Arctic Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 73.6 361 40th
GPQA Diamond 65.6 349 42th
SWE-bench Verified 57.6 361 40th
HumanEval 75.0 344 43th
MATH-500 71.4 374 38th
AIME 2025 66.0 330 45th
LiveCodeBench 61.6 355 41th
IFEval 77.6 370 38th
TruthfulQA 73.9 355 41th
HellaSwag 79.7 383 36th
MMMU 66.1 369 39th

FAQ

What score does Arctic Chat get on Arena Elo?

Arctic Chat scores 1342.4 on Arena Elo in this index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the top score is 1501.9.

How does Arctic Chat rank on Arena Elo?

It ranks #377 of 600 models, in the 37th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Is Arctic Chat good at Arena Elo?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the Arena Elo score calculated?

Arena Elo is a preference benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Arctic Chat cost?

Arctic Chat costs $2.70 per million input tokens and $11.83 per million output tokens.

Related