Commonsense · Snowflake

Arctic Instruct on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Arctic Instruct scores 83.6 on HellaSwag, placing it #297 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
83.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#297
of 600
Percentile
51th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
12.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Arctic Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Arctic Instruct sits at #297 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 12.5 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Arctic Instruct above the midpoint.

Snowflake models average 75.0 on this benchmark. Arctic Instruct is 8.6 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Snowflake model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 80.2. Arctic Instruct is 3.4 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 83.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.83 per million input tokens, Arctic Instruct is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3.1 Chat Meta AI 32768 $3.82 75.3
Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat Together AI 200000 $3.95 76.1
Mixtral Chat Mistral AI 65536 $3.30 72.6
Seed-OSS Base ByteDance 16384 $3.14 72.2
Arctic Instruct Snowflake 65536 $2.83 70.6
Doubao 1.5 Pro Mini ByteDance 32768 $8.30 72.3
Llama 3 DeepInfra Chat DeepInfra 200000 $3.74 75.0

Other benchmarks for Arctic Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 72.3 380 37th
GPQA Diamond 64.6 367 39th
SWE-bench Verified 58.3 348 42th
HumanEval 74.1 356 41th
MATH-500 74.3 340 43th
AIME 2025 66.7 318 47th
LiveCodeBench 65.2 288 52th
IFEval 78.9 357 41th
TruthfulQA 74.1 350 42th
MMMU 64.9 381 37th
Arena Elo 1343.7 375 38th

FAQ

What score does Arctic Instruct get on HellaSwag?

Arctic Instruct scores 83.6 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Arctic Instruct rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #297 of 600 models, in the 51st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Arctic Instruct good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Arctic Instruct cost?

Arctic Instruct costs $2.83 per million input tokens and $13.96 per million output tokens.

Related