Mathematics · Snowflake

Arctic Instruct on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Arctic Instruct scores 74.3 on MATH-500, placing it #340 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
74.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#340
of 600
Percentile
43th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
22.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Arctic Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Arctic Instruct sits at #340 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 22.4 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Arctic Instruct below the midpoint.

Snowflake models average 62.3 on this benchmark. Arctic Instruct is 12.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Snowflake model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 70.8. Arctic Instruct is 3.5 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 74.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.83 per million input tokens, Arctic Instruct is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Mini Anthropic 32768 $9.74 73.0
Firefunction Pro Fireworks AI 16384 $9.05 72.9
Phi-3.5 Instruct Microsoft 16384 $2.67 70.1
o3 Nano OpenAI 32768 $7.78 70.6
Arctic Instruct Snowflake 65536 $2.83 70.6
DeepSeek-Coder Base DeepSeek 32768 $3.53 74.1
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base Cerebras 65536 $3.36 72.7

Other benchmarks for Arctic Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 72.3 380 37th
GPQA Diamond 64.6 367 39th
SWE-bench Verified 58.3 348 42th
HumanEval 74.1 356 41th
AIME 2025 66.7 318 47th
LiveCodeBench 65.2 288 52th
IFEval 78.9 357 41th
TruthfulQA 74.1 350 42th
HellaSwag 83.6 297 51th
MMMU 64.9 381 37th
Arena Elo 1343.7 375 38th

FAQ

What score does Arctic Instruct get on MATH-500?

Arctic Instruct scores 74.3 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Arctic Instruct rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #340 of 600 models, in the 43rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Arctic Instruct good at MATH-500?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Arctic Instruct cost?

Arctic Instruct costs $2.83 per million input tokens and $13.96 per million output tokens.

Related