Multimodal · Snowflake

Arctic Instruct on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Arctic Instruct scores 64.9 on MMMU, placing it #381 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
64.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#381
of 600
Percentile
37th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
22.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Arctic Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Arctic Instruct sits at #381 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 22.0 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Arctic Instruct below the midpoint.

Snowflake models average 56.8 on this benchmark. Arctic Instruct is 8.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Snowflake model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 65.1. Arctic Instruct is 0.2 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 64.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.83 per million input tokens, Arctic Instruct is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
DeepSeek-V3.2 8B DeepSeek 32768 $2.02 66.2
Doubao 1.5 Pro Nano ByteDance 16384 $5.78 66.6
Phi-3.5 Instruct Microsoft 16384 $2.67 70.1
Command A Nano Cohere 8192 $5.90 66.3
Arctic Instruct Snowflake 65536 $2.83 70.6
Molmo Chat Allen Institute for AI 32768 $2.40 66.7
Nemotron Nano NVIDIA 8192 $2.24 66.6

Other benchmarks for Arctic Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 72.3 380 37th
GPQA Diamond 64.6 367 39th
SWE-bench Verified 58.3 348 42th
HumanEval 74.1 356 41th
MATH-500 74.3 340 43th
AIME 2025 66.7 318 47th
LiveCodeBench 65.2 288 52th
IFEval 78.9 357 41th
TruthfulQA 74.1 350 42th
HellaSwag 83.6 297 51th
Arena Elo 1343.7 375 38th

FAQ

What score does Arctic Instruct get on MMMU?

Arctic Instruct scores 64.9 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Arctic Instruct rank on MMMU?

It ranks #381 of 600 models, in the 37th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Arctic Instruct good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Arctic Instruct cost?

Arctic Instruct costs $2.83 per million input tokens and $13.96 per million output tokens.

Related