Coding · OpenRouter

Auto Mini on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Auto Mini scores 66.1 on HumanEval, placing it #428 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
66.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#428
of 600
Percentile
29th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
30.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Auto Mini highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Auto Mini sits at #428 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 30.7 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Auto Mini below the midpoint.

OpenRouter models average 73.0 on this benchmark. Auto Mini is 6.9 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average OpenRouter model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 71.5. Auto Mini is 5.4 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 66.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.24 per million input tokens, Auto Mini is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GLM-4.6 7B Zhipu AI 16384 $1.52 61.8
Mistral Large 3 8B Mistral AI 16384 $1.62 61.6
Llama 4 Scout 8B Meta AI 8192 $1.46 61.2
Pythia Instruct EleutherAI 8192 $1.41 60.8
Auto Mini OpenRouter 4096 $4.24 61.6
Kimi K1.5 8B Moonshot AI 8192 $1.54 62.2
Mistral Large 3 7B Mistral AI 32768 $1.44 61.1

Other benchmarks for Auto Mini

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 68.8 407 32th
GPQA Diamond 55.8 451 25th
SWE-bench Verified 48.8 431 28th
MATH-500 62.1 442 26th
AIME 2025 49.8 462 23th
LiveCodeBench 53.1 417 31th
IFEval 72.4 426 29th
TruthfulQA 67.0 429 29th
HellaSwag 74.7 446 26th
MMMU 59.3 436 27th
Arena Elo 1290.3 431 28th

FAQ

What score does Auto Mini get on HumanEval?

Auto Mini scores 66.1 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Auto Mini rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #428 of 600 models, in the 29th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Auto Mini good at HumanEval?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Auto Mini cost?

Auto Mini costs $4.24 per million input tokens and $18.05 per million output tokens.

Related