Mathematics · OpenRouter

Auto Nano on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Auto Nano scores 60.0 on MATH-500, placing it #464 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
60.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#464
of 600
Percentile
23th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
36.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Auto Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Auto Nano sits at #464 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 36.7 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Auto Nano below the midpoint.

OpenRouter models average 70.2 on this benchmark. Auto Nano is 10.2 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average OpenRouter model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 70.0. Auto Nano is 10.0 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 60.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.83 per million input tokens, Auto Nano is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Yi-Lightning 8B 01.AI 4096 $1.16 59.2
GPT-NeoX Base EleutherAI 16384 $1.22 59.7
Llama 3.3 Groq 8B Groq 16384 $1.17 59.5
SmolLM3 Base Hugging Face 16384 $1.38 60.4
Auto Nano OpenRouter 4096 $2.83 57.1
Nemotron 4 8B NVIDIA 4096 $1.06 57.9
Yi-Lightning 7B 01.AI 32768 $1.00 55.9

Other benchmarks for Auto Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 65.0 453 25th
GPQA Diamond 50.2 520 13th
SWE-bench Verified 44.2 475 21th
HumanEval 62.7 461 23th
AIME 2025 44.2 505 16th
LiveCodeBench 46.5 483 20th
IFEval 66.5 508 15th
TruthfulQA 61.7 509 15th
HellaSwag 72.2 490 18th
MMMU 55.2 494 18th
Arena Elo 1256.0 481 20th

FAQ

What score does Auto Nano get on MATH-500?

Auto Nano scores 60.0 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Auto Nano rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #464 of 600 models, in the 23rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Auto Nano good at MATH-500?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Auto Nano cost?

Auto Nano costs $2.83 per million input tokens and $14.41 per million output tokens.

Related