Multimodal · OpenRouter

Auto Pro on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Auto Pro scores 66.3 on MMMU, placing it #366 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
66.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#366
of 600
Percentile
39th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
20.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Auto Pro highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Auto Pro sits at #366 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 20.6 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Auto Pro below the midpoint.

OpenRouter models average 66.0 on this benchmark. Auto Pro is 0.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average OpenRouter model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 65.0. Auto Pro is 1.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 66.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $8.41 per million input tokens, Auto Pro is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Claude Haiku 4.5 Mini Anthropic 16384 $8.76 71.6
GPT-4.1 Nano OpenAI 32768 $7.42 70.5
Mixtral Base Mistral AI 65536 $2.95 71.1
Mixtral Turbo Instruct Together AI 32768 $3.16 71.9
Auto Pro OpenRouter 8192 $8.41 71.2
Auto Max OpenRouter 8192 $8.41 71.2
Nemotron Nano Instruct NVIDIA 32768 $2.33 67.4

Other benchmarks for Auto Pro

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 76.6 287 52th
GPQA Diamond 68.8 300 50th
SWE-bench Verified 60.5 316 47th
HumanEval 76.7 313 48th
MATH-500 71.4 375 38th
AIME 2025 65.5 335 44th
LiveCodeBench 62.7 337 44th
IFEval 80.7 317 47th
TruthfulQA 72.7 373 38th
HellaSwag 81.6 356 41th
Arena Elo 1356.0 353 41th

FAQ

What score does Auto Pro get on MMMU?

Auto Pro scores 66.3 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Auto Pro rank on MMMU?

It ranks #366 of 600 models, in the 39th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Auto Pro good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Auto Pro cost?

Auto Pro costs $8.41 per million input tokens and $45.80 per million output tokens.

Related