Coding · OpenRouter

Auto on LiveCodeBench: score, rank and what it means

Auto scores 59.0 on LiveCodeBench, placing it #378 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Score
59.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#378
of 600
Percentile
37th
within the index
Benchmark avg
61.0
all models
Leader
85.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Gap to leader
26.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on LiveCodeBench, with Auto highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.1
Grok 4 Reasoning 85.1
Claude Opus 4.5 85.0
GPT-5.2 Max 84.8
Grok 4 Turbo 84.7
GPT-5.1 Turbo 84.6
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.6
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 84.1
Gemini 3 Pro Max 83.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
2 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
6 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
7 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
8 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On LiveCodeBench, Auto sits at #378 of 600. The leader, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning, scores 85.1, so the gap to the top is 26.1 points. The median model in this index scores 64.7, which puts Auto below the midpoint.

OpenRouter models average 58.5 on this benchmark. Auto is 0.5 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average OpenRouter model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 58.3. Auto is 0.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 59.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $7.53 per million input tokens, Auto is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on LiveCodeBench. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Nova Pro Mini Amazon 16384 $7.74 70.6
Sonar Pro Mini Perplexity 8192 $8.02 70.3
Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.28 69.2
Hunyuan-Turbo Mini Tencent 8192 $6.59 68.3
Auto OpenRouter 32768 $7.53 70.2
DeepSeek-V3.2 8B DeepSeek 32768 $2.02 66.2
Mixtral Groq Base Groq 32768 $2.66 68.4

Other benchmarks for Auto

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 73.6 362 40th
GPQA Diamond 63.9 378 37th
SWE-bench Verified 58.1 355 41th
HumanEval 75.2 340 43th
MATH-500 74.1 343 43th
AIME 2025 67.0 313 48th
IFEval 77.3 375 38th
TruthfulQA 73.8 357 41th
HellaSwag 81.1 364 39th
MMMU 69.6 314 48th
Arena Elo 1341.2 378 37th

FAQ

What score does Auto get on LiveCodeBench?

Auto scores 59.0 on LiveCodeBench in this index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the top score is 85.1.

How does Auto rank on LiveCodeBench?

It ranks #378 of 600 models, in the 37th percentile. The leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Is Auto good at LiveCodeBench?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the LiveCodeBench score calculated?

LiveCodeBench is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Auto cost?

Auto costs $7.53 per million input tokens and $29.19 per million output tokens.

Related