Multimodal · OpenRouter

Auto on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Auto scores 69.6 on MMMU, placing it #314 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
69.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#314
of 600
Percentile
48th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
17.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Auto highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Auto sits at #314 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 17.3 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Auto below the midpoint.

OpenRouter models average 66.0 on this benchmark. Auto is 3.6 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average OpenRouter model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 65.0. Auto is 4.6 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 69.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $7.53 per million input tokens, Auto is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 Anyscale Instruct Anyscale 200000 $3.91 75.7
Llama 3.3 Groq Base Groq 16384 $3.24 73.5
Llama 3.3 Base Meta AI 32768 $3.63 74.0
Reka Core Mini Reka AI 8192 $7.48 70.1
Auto OpenRouter 32768 $7.53 70.2
Command R+ Base Cohere 65536 $3.24 71.6
Gemini 3 Flash Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.56 69.4

Other benchmarks for Auto

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 73.6 362 40th
GPQA Diamond 63.9 378 37th
SWE-bench Verified 58.1 355 41th
HumanEval 75.2 340 43th
MATH-500 74.1 343 43th
AIME 2025 67.0 313 48th
LiveCodeBench 59.0 378 37th
IFEval 77.3 375 38th
TruthfulQA 73.8 357 41th
HellaSwag 81.1 364 39th
Arena Elo 1341.2 378 37th

FAQ

What score does Auto get on MMMU?

Auto scores 69.6 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Auto rank on MMMU?

It ranks #314 of 600 models, in the 48th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Auto good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Auto cost?

Auto costs $7.53 per million input tokens and $29.19 per million output tokens.

Related