Multimodal · Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano scores 65.6 on MMMU, placing it #376 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
65.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#376
of 600
Percentile
37th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
21.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano sits at #376 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 21.3 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano below the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 77.3 on this benchmark. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano is 11.7 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Anthropic model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 65.0. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano is 0.6 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 65.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $6.93 per million input tokens, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
ERNIE 4.0 Mini Baidu 32768 $7.11 68.8
Llama 3 Replicate Base Replicate 65536 $3.15 72.1
Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.28 69.2
Molmo Instruct Allen Institute for AI 32768 $2.53 68.3
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano Anthropic 65536 $6.93 68.9
DeepSeek-V3.2 8B DeepSeek 32768 $2.02 66.2
Doubao 1.5 Pro Nano ByteDance 16384 $5.78 66.6

Other benchmarks for Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 72.5 373 38th
GPQA Diamond 63.8 379 37th
SWE-bench Verified 58.9 344 43th
HumanEval 72.8 376 37th
MATH-500 72.4 363 40th
AIME 2025 62.0 376 37th
LiveCodeBench 59.7 372 38th
IFEval 76.2 386 36th
TruthfulQA 73.0 368 39th
HellaSwag 81.1 365 39th
Arena Elo 1338.9 379 37th

FAQ

What score does Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano get on MMMU?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano scores 65.6 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano rank on MMMU?

It ranks #376 of 600 models, in the 37th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano cost?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano costs $6.93 per million input tokens and $27.07 per million output tokens.

Related