Mathematics · Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning scores 90.3 on MATH-500, placing it #45 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
90.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#45
of 600
Percentile
93th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
6.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning sits at #45 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 6.4 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 85.3 on this benchmark. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning is 5.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Anthropic model.

Among frontier models, the average is 90.8. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning is 0.5 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 90.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $16.30 per million input tokens, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
o3 Turbo OpenAI 200000 $16.63 83.4
o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
o4 OpenAI 2000000 $17.74 85.4
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning Anthropic 128000 $16.30 83.7
DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat DeepSeek 1000000 $5.80 82.5
Grok 3 Reasoning xAI 200000 $16.07 82.9

Other benchmarks for Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 86.4 45 93th
GPQA Diamond 81.3 39 94th
SWE-bench Verified 71.0 95 84th
HumanEval 89.2 57 91th
AIME 2025 79.8 92 85th
LiveCodeBench 79.6 48 92th
IFEval 90.1 69 89th
TruthfulQA 86.2 47 92th
HellaSwag 90.4 75 88th
MMMU 76.5 122 80th
Arena Elo 1464.4 44 93th

FAQ

What score does Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning get on MATH-500?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning scores 90.3 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #45 of 600 models, in the 93rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning good at MATH-500?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning cost?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Reasoning costs $16.30 per million input tokens and $77.62 per million output tokens.

Related