Commonsense · Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano scores 80.5 on HellaSwag, placing it #378 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
80.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#378
of 600
Percentile
37th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
15.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano sits at #378 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 15.6 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano below the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 89.3 on this benchmark. Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano is 8.8 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Anthropic model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 79.8. Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano is 0.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 80.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $6.47 per million input tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
DBRX Chat Databricks 65536 $3.07 71.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.28 69.2
Sonar Pro Mini Perplexity 8192 $8.02 70.3
Arctic Snowflake 8192 $2.72 68.8
Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano Anthropic 8192 $6.47 68.7
Arctic Base Snowflake 32768 $2.27 67.5
Firesearch Turbo Fireworks AI 16384 $7.58 69.3

Other benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 73.9 355 41th
GPQA Diamond 64.5 369 39th
SWE-bench Verified 56.9 367 39th
HumanEval 71.0 388 35th
MATH-500 71.8 369 39th
AIME 2025 63.5 361 40th
LiveCodeBench 59.8 369 39th
IFEval 78.2 363 40th
TruthfulQA 71.6 385 36th
MMMU 64.3 386 36th
Arena Elo 1332.1 385 36th

FAQ

What score does Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano get on HellaSwag?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano scores 80.5 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #378 of 600 models, in the 37th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano good at HellaSwag?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano cost?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano costs $6.47 per million input tokens and $27.98 per million output tokens.

Related