Mathematics · Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano scores 71.8 on MATH-500, placing it #369 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
71.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#369
of 600
Percentile
39th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
24.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano sits at #369 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 24.9 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano below the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 85.3 on this benchmark. Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano is 13.5 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Anthropic model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 70.0. Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano is 1.8 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 71.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $6.47 per million input tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
OLMo 2 Instruct Allen Institute for AI 32768 $3.03 71.7
Molmo Allen Institute for AI 32768 $2.49 68.5
Llama 3 Novita Base Novita AI 8192 $3.06 70.3
Phi-4 Base Microsoft 32768 $3.15 71.2
Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano Anthropic 8192 $6.47 68.7
Arctic Base Snowflake 32768 $2.27 67.5
ERNIE 4.0 Mini Baidu 32768 $7.11 68.8

Other benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 73.9 355 41th
GPQA Diamond 64.5 369 39th
SWE-bench Verified 56.9 367 39th
HumanEval 71.0 388 35th
AIME 2025 63.5 361 40th
LiveCodeBench 59.8 369 39th
IFEval 78.2 363 40th
TruthfulQA 71.6 385 36th
HellaSwag 80.5 378 37th
MMMU 64.3 386 36th
Arena Elo 1332.1 385 36th

FAQ

What score does Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano get on MATH-500?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano scores 71.8 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #369 of 600 models, in the 39th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano good at MATH-500?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano cost?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano costs $6.47 per million input tokens and $27.98 per million output tokens.

Related