Reasoning · Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro scores 75.7 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #128 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
75.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#128
of 600
Percentile
79th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
11.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro sits at #128 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 11.3 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 77.3 on this benchmark. Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro is 1.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Anthropic model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro is 2.2 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 75.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $15.07 per million input tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GLM-4.6 Instruct Zhipu AI 1000000 $5.15 80.4
Hunyuan-Turbo Max Tencent 128000 $12.40 78.3
Magistral Mistral AI 200000 $4.75 79.8
Qwen3 Base Alibaba Cloud 65536 $4.33 77.4
Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $15.07 80.8
ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning Baidu 1000000 $14.36 79.8
Gemini 3 Flash Vision Google DeepMind 400000 $15.06 81.9

Other benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 81.5 133 78th
SWE-bench Verified 70.4 101 83th
HumanEval 86.0 101 83th
MATH-500 83.7 131 78th
AIME 2025 80.1 87 86th
LiveCodeBench 72.4 138 77th
IFEval 90.1 70 88th
TruthfulQA 84.1 81 87th
HellaSwag 89.3 105 83th
MMMU 75.3 157 74th
Arena Elo 1436.2 105 83th

FAQ

What score does Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro get on GPQA Diamond?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro scores 75.7 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #128 of 600 models, in the 79th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro good at GPQA Diamond?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro cost?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro costs $15.07 per million input tokens and $73.96 per million output tokens.

Related