Safety · Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning scores 82.5 on TruthfulQA, placing it #116 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
82.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#116
of 600
Percentile
81th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
8.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning sits at #116 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 8.6 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 82.9 on this benchmark. Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning is 0.4 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Anthropic model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 80.1. Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning is 2.4 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 82.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $15.11 per million input tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Kimi K2 Instruct Moonshot AI 1000000 $5.80 82.3
QwQ Instruct Alibaba Cloud 65536 $4.62 79.0
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Turbo Anthropic 200000 $15.56 82.3
Llama 4 Maverick Meta AI 200000 $5.36 81.6
Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 128000 $15.11 81.4
ERNIE 4.5 Turbo Baidu 128000 $13.75 79.7
GLM-4.6 Zhipu AI 128000 $5.10 80.2

Other benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 83.4 96 84th
GPQA Diamond 74.6 150 75th
SWE-bench Verified 69.6 119 80th
HumanEval 88.7 61 90th
MATH-500 85.8 95 84th
AIME 2025 79.0 100 83th
LiveCodeBench 73.8 111 82th
IFEval 89.9 73 88th
HellaSwag 90.9 64 89th
MMMU 76.7 117 81th
Arena Elo 1444.2 90 85th

FAQ

What score does Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning get on TruthfulQA?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning scores 82.5 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #116 of 600 models, in the 81st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning good at TruthfulQA?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning cost?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning costs $15.11 per million input tokens and $70.05 per million output tokens.

Related