Commonsense · Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 89.6 on HellaSwag, placing it #97 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
89.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#97
of 600
Percentile
84th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
6.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Claude Haiku 4.5 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Claude Haiku 4.5 sits at #97 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 6.5 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Claude Haiku 4.5 above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 89.3 on this benchmark. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 0.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Anthropic model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 86.8. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 2.8 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 89.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $13.86 per million input tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GPT-4.1 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $14.88 82.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $15.20 81.6
Grok 3 Reasoning xAI 200000 $16.07 82.9
o3 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $15.24 81.8
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 1000000 $13.86 79.4
Llama 4 Maverick Instruct Meta AI 200000 $5.33 81.7
Gemini 3 Flash Turbo Google DeepMind 200000 $17.07 84.1

Other benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 84.1 79 87th
GPQA Diamond 74.1 164 73th
SWE-bench Verified 69.2 127 79th
HumanEval 84.7 122 80th
MATH-500 81.4 178 70th
AIME 2025 76.5 134 78th
LiveCodeBench 71.6 155 74th
IFEval 85.2 181 70th
TruthfulQA 79.6 197 67th
MMMU 77.6 103 83th
Arena Elo 1421.8 139 77th

FAQ

What score does Claude Haiku 4.5 get on HellaSwag?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 89.6 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #97 of 600 models, in the 84th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Haiku 4.5 cost?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $13.86 per million input tokens and $74.67 per million output tokens.

Related