Instruction following · Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 on IFEval: score, rank and what it means

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 85.2 on IFEval, placing it #181 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Score
85.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#181
of 600
Percentile
70th
within the index
Benchmark avg
78.6
all models
Leader
96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
10.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on IFEval, with Claude Haiku 4.5 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.6
GPT-5.2 Max 95.2
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 95.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 94.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 94.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.5
o4 Reasoning 94.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
8 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5

What this score means

On IFEval, Claude Haiku 4.5 sits at #181 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 10.9 points. The median model in this index scores 81.2, which puts Claude Haiku 4.5 above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 88.3 on this benchmark. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 3.1 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Anthropic model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 85.2. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 0.0 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 85.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $13.86 per million input tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on IFEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 4 Scout Chat Meta AI 32768 $4.66 78.0
Mistral Small 3 Instruct Mistral AI 32768 $3.97 75.1
Qwen3 Base Alibaba Cloud 65536 $4.33 77.4
Qwen3-Coder Instruct Alibaba Cloud 128000 $4.66 78.1
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 1000000 $13.86 79.4
ERNIE 4.0 Turbo Baidu 65536 $12.00 78.0
ERNIE 4.5 Turbo Baidu 128000 $13.75 79.7

Other benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 84.1 79 87th
GPQA Diamond 74.1 164 73th
SWE-bench Verified 69.2 127 79th
HumanEval 84.7 122 80th
MATH-500 81.4 178 70th
AIME 2025 76.5 134 78th
LiveCodeBench 71.6 155 74th
TruthfulQA 79.6 197 67th
HellaSwag 89.6 97 84th
MMMU 77.6 103 83th
Arena Elo 1421.8 139 77th

FAQ

What score does Claude Haiku 4.5 get on IFEval?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 85.2 on IFEval in this index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 rank on IFEval?

It ranks #181 of 600 models, in the 70th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 good at IFEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the IFEval score calculated?

IFEval is a instruction following benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Haiku 4.5 cost?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $13.86 per million input tokens and $74.67 per million output tokens.

Related